Skip to main content

Table 2 Regression results of the moderation of resilience in the relationships between childhood trauma and PLEs #

From: Moderating and mediating effects of resilience between childhood trauma and psychotic-like experiences among college students

Outcome

Predictors

b

t

p

95% CI

PLEs

CT

0.25

16.47

< 0.001

0.22,0.28

 

Resilience

-0.18

-10.95

< 0.001

-0.21,-0.15

 

CT×Resilience

-0.07

-5.20

< 0.001

-0.10,-0.04

 

Simple slope analysis

    
 

Low resilience

0.30

16.74

< 0.001

0.27,0.34

 

Medium resilience

0.25

16.84

< 0.001

0.22,0.28

 

High resilience

0.17

7.87

< 0.001

0.13,0.21

DEs

CT

0.23

15.34

< 0.001

0.20,0.26

 

Resilience

-0.19

-11.58

< 0.001

-0.22,-0.16

 

CT×Resilience

-0.05

-3.64

< 0.001

-0.07,-0.02

 

Simple slope analysis

    
 

Low resilience

0.27

14.88

< 0.001

0.24,0.31

 

Medium resilience

0.24

15.60

< 0.001

0.21,0.27

 

High resilience

0.18

8.17

< 0.001

0.13,0.22

HEs

CT

0.22

14.44

< 0.001

0.19,0.25

 

Resilience

-0.08

-4.52

< 0.001

-0.11,-0.04

 

CT×Resilience

-0.12

-8.94

< 0.001

-0.14,-0.09

 

Simple slope analysis

    
 

Low resilience

0.32

17.25

< 0.001

0.28,0.36

 

Medium resilience

0.23

15.07

< 0.001

0.20,0.26

 

High resilience

0.09

3.87

< 0.001

0.04,0.13

  1. Abbreviations CT = Childhood trauma; PLEs = psychotic-like experiences; DEs = delusional experiences, HEs = hallucinatory experiences; CI = Confidence interval
  2. # Adjusting for sex, grade, age, ethnicity, parental marital status, family income, parents’ education, and single child status