Skip to main content

Table 5 Fit Indices from Comparative Factor Analysis (CFA) and Invariance Analyses between Groups for the GAD-7

From: Are comparisons of mental disorders between Chinese and German students possible? An examination of measurement invariance for the PHQ-15, PHQ-9 and GAD-7

 

χ2 (df)

CFI

RMSEA [90% CI]

SRMR

ΔCFI

Δχ2 (df)

Single group CFA − original one-factor model

 German Students

53.671 (14)

.967

.083 [.060, .106]

.035

  

 Chinese Students

49.414 (14)

.977

.078 [.055, .102]

.028

  

Single group CFA (θ5, 6 free)

 German Students

44.662 (13)

.974

.077 [.053, .102]

.031

.013

9.009, p > .001

 Chinese Students

34.195 (13)

.986

.063 [.038, .089]

.023

.009

15.219

Multiple group CFA models (θ5, 6 free)

 Configural invariance

87.866 (27)

.978

.074 [.057, .091]

.030

  

 Metric invariance

127.041 (34)

.966

.081 [.066, .097]

.073

.012

39.175 (7)

 λ1 free

107.649 (33)

.973

.074 [.059, .090]

.048

.005

19.783 (6), p > .001

 Scale invariance

185.052 (39)

.947

.095 [.082, .109]

.063

.026

77.403 (6)

 τ4 free

164.669 (38)

.954

.090 [.076, .104]

.058

.019

57.020 (5)

 τ4, τ1 free

137.262 (37)

.963

.081 [.067, .096]

.052

.010

29.613 (4)

 τ4, τ1, τ2 free

120.930 (36)

.969

.075 [.061, .090]

.052

.004

13.281 (3), p > .001

  1. Note. GAD-7 = Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item; Item 1 = ‘feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge’; item 2 = ‘not being able to stop or control worrying’; item 4 = ‘trouble relaxing.’ All χ2 tests and Δχ2 were significant, p < .001