Skip to main content

Table 5 Change in domain score per one unit/SDa increase in service variable (95% confidence intervals) and p values, for each linear regresion model (domain)

From: Predictors of quality of care in mental health supported accommodation services in England: a multiple regression modelling study

Service variable

SD for ratio service variablesa

Living Environment (n = 115)

Therapeutic Environment (n = 150)

Treatments and Interventions (n = 150)

Self-Management and Auton. (n = 150)

Social Interface (n = 150)

Human Rights (n = 150)

Recovery Based Practice (n = 150)

Local authority area index score

–

−2.3 (− 2.6, − 2.0), < 0.001

−1.8 (− 3.2, − 0.5), 0.007

− 1.4 (− 3.3, 0.5), 0.140

− 0.4 (− 1.5, 0.7), 0.512

−2.9 (−6.6, 0.7), 0.114

−2.2 (− 3.8, − 0.6), 0.006

−2.0 (− 2.9, − 1.2), < 0.001

Total beds/places

–

− 0.0 (− 0.4, 0.4), 0.908

−0.1 (− 0.1, 0.0), 0.001

−0.1 (− 0.2, − 0.1), 0.001

−0.1 (− 0.2, 0.0), 0.072

−0.1 (− 0.3, 0.0), 0.052

0.0 (− 0.3, 0.3), 0.996

−0.1 (− 0.2, 0.0), 0.043

Staffing intensity (total staff FTE divided by total beds/places)a

–

− 0.4 (− 1.5, 0.7), 0.474

1.5 (0.8, 2.2), < 0.001

6.0 (3.9, 8.1), < 0.001

1.4 (− 10.6, 7.8), 0.061

− 1.4 (− 10.6, 7.8), 0.767

− 6.1 (− 10.4, − 1.8), 0.006

1.3 (− 3.4, 6.0), 0.598

0.3

−0.1 (− 0.5, 0.2), 0.474

0.5 (0.3, 0.7), < 0.001

2.0 (1.3, 2.7), < 0.001

0.5 (0.0, 0.9), 0.061

− 0.5 (− 3.5, 2.6), 0.767

− 2.0 (− 3.5, − 0.6), 0.006

0.4 (−1.1, 2.0), 0.598

Expected usual length of stay (years)

–

− 0.2 (− 0.4, 0.0), 0.017

−0.4 (− 0.5, − 0.3), < 0.001

−0.1 (− 0.2, 0.0), 0.019

−0.4 (− 0.8, − 0.1), 0.019

−0.3 (− 0.4, − 0.2), < 0.001

−0.3 (− 0.6, 0.1), 0.151

−0.7 (− 0.8, − 0.6), < 0.001

Service user sex ratio (percentage of male service users)a

–

− 1.5 (− 10.7, 7.8), 0.753

3.2 (− 1.3, 7.7), 0.166

5.9 (1.0, 10.8), 0.018

3.9 (−0.7, 8.5), 0.098

5.0 (−0.2, 10.3), 0.061

−2.5 (− 5.0, 0.0), 0.046

4.6 (−4.3, 13.5), 0.308

0.2

−0.4 (− 2.5, 1.8), 0.753

0.8 (− 0.3, 1.8), 0.166

1.4 (0.2, 2.6), 0.018

0.9 (− 0.2, 2.0), 0.098

1.2 (− 0.1, 2.4), 0.061

−0.6 (− 1.2, 0.0), 0.046

1.1 (− 1.0, 3.2), 0.308

Service user ability (percentage ‘able to do very little’)a

–

− 0.1 (− 2.0, 1.9), 0.942

−1.5 (− 7.0, 3.9), 0.583

1.0 (− 8.3, 10.3), 0.83

− 3.7 (− 14.2, 6.7), 0.485

5.1 (− 5.8, 16.1), 0.357

−1.4 (− 8.2, 5.5), 0.691

−5.5 (− 13.1, 2.2), 0.160

0.2

0.0 (−0.4, 0.4), 0.942

− 0.3 (− 1.5, 0.8), 0.583

0.2 (− 1.8, 2.2), 0.833

−0.8 (− 3.0, 1.4), 0.485

1.1 (−1.2, 3.4), 0.357

−0.3 (− 1.8, 1.2), 0.691

−1.2 (− 2.8, 0.5), 0.160

  1. aFor service variables that are ratios (staffing intensity, service user sex ratio and service user ability), the change in domain score per one SD increase in the service variable has also been included
Back to article page

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us