Skip to main content

Table 4 GRADE table for APP compared to Antipsychotic monotherapy for metabolic effects in schizophrenia

From: Antipsychotic polypharmacy and metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia: a review of systematic reviews

GRADE assessment

Outcome

â„– of reviews

Risk of bias

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Imprecision

Other considerations

GRADE Quality rating

Metabolic syndrome

2

Seriousa

Seriousb

Seriousb

Seriousb

Publication bias strongly suspectedc

⊕◯◯◯ VERY LOW

Lipid disorder

8

Seriousa

Not serious

Seriousd

Seriouse

Publication bias strongly suspectedf

⊕◯◯◯ VERY LOW

Diabetes

3

Seriousa

Seriousg

Seriousd

Seriouse

Publication bias strongly suspected strong associationh

⊕◯◯◯ VERY LOW

Hypertension

1

Seriousa

Not serious

Not serious

Seriouse

Publication bias strongly suspectedi

⊕◯◯◯ VERY LOW

  1. Explanations
  2. aAll included reviews were low quality based on AMSTAR. Not all reviews included RCTs alone, and not all performed quality assessment of the included studies. Primary studies were short term, small and often uncontrolled
  3. bOnly one review reported findings but without data on direct comparison
  4. cNone of the two reviews searched for unpublished studies or assessed publication bias
  5. dReviews used various comparisons (before and after; one time prevalence; specific combinations of antipsychotic versus any antipsychotic)
  6. eWide confidence intervals and/or ranges
  7. fOnly two reviews searched for unpublished studies and none assessed publication bias
  8. gReview findings were contrasting
  9. hOnly one review searched for unpublished studies. None assessed publication bias
  10. iOnly one review reported on this outcome which did not report a search for unpublished studies nor assessed publication bias for this outcome
  11. Grade evidence levels
  12. High = Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect
  13. Moderate = Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate
  14. Low = Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate
  15. Very low = Any estimate of effect is very uncertain