Skip to main content

Table 3 Psychometric properties of the Arabic CAM-ICU according to mechanical ventilation status

From: Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU)

Property

CAM-ICU by nurse

(n = 40)

CAM-ICU by intensivist (n = 39)

Mechanical ventilation

 Sensitivity (95%CI)

0.75 (0.58–0.92)

0.70 (0.51–0.88)

 Specificity (95%CI)

0.94 (0.82–1.0)

0.88 (0.71–1.0)

 Likelihood Ratio LR+ (95%CI)

12 (11.9–12.1)

5.57 (5.4–5.7)

 Likelihood Ratio LR- (95%CI)

0.27 (0.07–0.46)

0.35 (0.15–0.55)

 Positive predicted value (95%CI)

0.95 (0.85–1.0)

0.89 (0.74–1.0)

 Negative predicted value (95%CI)

0.71 (0.52–0.91)

0.67 (0.47–0.87)

 Pre-test probability

0.60

0.59

 Pre-test odds

1.5

1.44

 Post-test odds

18.0

8.0

 Post-test probability

0.95

0.89

 Delirium prevalence, CAM-ICU vs. psychiatrist clinical assessment

47.5% vs. 60%

46.2% vs. 59%

 Accuracy

82.5%

76.9%

No mechanical ventilation

 Sensitivity (95%CI)

0.73 (0.60–0.86)

0.50 (0.34–0.64)

 Specificity (95%CI)

1.0 (1.0–1.0)

0.96 (0.87–1.0)

 Likelihood Ratio LR+ (95%CI)

Undefined*

10.8 (10.7–10.8)

 Likelihood Ratio LR- (95%CI)

0.27 (0.12–0.43)

0.54 (0.39–0.68)

 Positive predicted value (95%CI)

1.0 (1.0–1.0)

0.96 (0.87–1.0)

 Negative predicted value (95%CI)

0.67 (0.51–0.82)

0.48 (0.33–0.63)

 Pre-test probability

0.65

0.67

 Pre-test odds

1.83

2.05

 Post-test odds

Undefined**

22.0

 Post-test probability

Undefined***

0.96

 Delirium prevalence, CAM-ICU vs. psychiatrist clinical assessment

47.1% vs. 64.7%

34.3% vs. 67.2%

 Accuracy

82.4%

64.2%

  1. CAM-ICU Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit, CI confidence interval * Specificity value is 1; ** Likelihood Ratio is undefined; *** Post-test odd is undefined