Skip to main content

Table 2 Unadjusted OR (95% CI) for self-harm by univariate analysis

From: A self-harm series and its relationship with childhood adversity among adolescents in mainland China: a cross-sectional study

 

Highly lethal self-harm

Less lethal self-harm with visible tissue damage

Self-harm without visible tissue damage

Self-harmful behaviors with latency damage

Psychological self-harm

Gender

Female: Male

1.30 (1.05, 1.62)*

2.18 (1.90, 2.49)***

1.18 (1.05, 1.31)**

1.11 (0.98, 1.27)

1.42 (1.25, 1.60)***

Age

 

1.07 (1.02, 1.34)*

1.06 (1.02, 1.09)***

1.11 (1.08, 1.14)***

1.17 (1.13, 1.21)***

1.16 (1.12, 1.20)***

Self-perceived family status

Ref: Bad

 

General

0.81 (0.60, 1.09)

0.85 (0.71, 1.01)

0.74 (0.64, 0.87)***

0.79 (0.66, 0.94)**

0.72 (0.60, 0.85)***

 

Good

0.92 (0.59, 1.41)

0.83 (0.63, 1.08)

0.67 (0.53, 0.85)***

0.84 (0.65, 1.09)

0.72 (0.56, 0.93)*

Relationship with mother

Good: Poor

0.55 (0.44, 0.70)***

0.76 (0.65, 0.87)***

0.83 (0.73, 0.94)**

0.64 (0.55, 0.74)***

0.67 (0.58, 0.77)***

Relationship with father

Good: Poor

0.59 (0.47, 0.73)***

0.69 (0.61, 0.79)***

0.73 (0.65, 0.83)***

0.63 (0.55, 0.72)***

0.66 (0.58, 0.75)***

Only child

Yes: No

0.61 (0.49, 0.77)***

0.62 (0.55, 0.71)***

0.77 (0.69, 0.86)***

0.77 (0.67, 0.87)***

0.70 (0.62, 0.80)***

Family structure

Ref: Nuclear Family

 

Lager family

1.14 (0.89, 1.47)

1.01 (0.87, 1.18)

1.08 (0.95, 1.23)

0.93 (0.79, 1.09)

1.01 (0.87, 1.16)

 

Single-parent Family

0.93 (0.61, 1.41)

1.06 (0.84, 1.34)

1.05 (0.85, 1.29)

1.07 (0.84, 1.35)

1.06 (0.85, 1.33)

 

Other

1.06 (0.49, 2.30)

1.32 (0.85, 2.04)

1.47 (0.99, 2.16)

1.40 (0.91, 2.14)

1.07 (0.70, 1.66)

Childhood physical peer victimization

Yes: No

2.49 (1.99, 3.12)***

2.21 (1.92, 2.55)***

2.20 (1.93, 2.50)***

2.22 (1.92, 2.56)***

2.26 (1.97, 2.60)***

Childhood verbal peer victimization

Yes: No

1.87 (1.50, 2.32)***

1.95 (1.71, 2.22)***

2.15 (1.92, 2.40)***

1.88 (1.65, 2.14)***

2.35 (2.07, 2.66)***

Childhood relational peer victimization

Yes: No

2.80 (2.25, 3.48)***

3.08 (2.69, 3.52)***

3.01 (2.67, 3.40)***

3.44 (3.01, 3.94)***

3,51 (3.08, 4.00)***

Physical abuse

Yes: No

3.62 (2.73, 4.81)***

2.43 (1.97, 3.00)***

2.89 (2.37, 3.54)***

2.99 (2.43, 3.68)***

3.51 (2.87, 4.30)***

Emotional abuse

Yes: No

4.41 (3.46, 5.62)***

3.30 (2.77, 3.93)***

3.16 (2.67, 3.74)***

3.25 (2.73, 3.87)***

3.85 (3.25, 4.57)***

Sexual abuse

Yes: No

4.07 (3.14, 5.29)***

3.12 (2.57, 3.78)***

2.71 (2.25, 3.27)***

3.34 (2.76, 4.04)***

2.97 (2.46, 3.59)***

Physical neglect

Yes: No

4.76 (3.60, 6.28)***

3.38 (2.73, 4.19)***

3.56 (2.87, 4.41)***

4.06 (3.28, 5.02)***

4.14 (3.35, 5.12)***

Emotional neglect

Yes: No

6.96 (5.08, 9.52)***

3.99 (3.05, 5.21)***

3.86 (2.93, 5.09)***

4.50 (3.44, 5.88)***

4.31 (3.29, 5.63)***

Family life stress event scores

Ref: 0

 

1–2

1.35 (1.04, 1.76)*

2.14 (1.81, 2.52)***

2.06 (1.79, 2.36)***

1.81 (1.54, 2.14)***

2.37 (2.01, 2.78)***

 

3–10

1.84 (1.39, 2.44)***

3.40 (2.84, 4.06)***

3.29 (2.83, 3.83)***

2.99 (2.51, 3.56)***

3.84 (3.23, 4.56)***

Depression

Yes: No

3.62 (2.65, 4.93)***

1.98 (1.71, 2.30)***

1.75 (1.55, 1.97)***

2.26 (1.94, 2.63)***

2.24 (1.94, 2.58)***

  1. Note: 95%CI = 95% confidence interval. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001
Back to article page

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us