From: An Integrated Recovery-oriented Model (IRM) for mental health services: evolution and challenges
Planning and Diagnosis | Intervention and Review | Transfer of Care/Discharge | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Recovery Goals | CR Assessment | Recovery Planning | CR Interventions | Clinical Review or Recovery-focused Tracking | |
Aspirations - Hope of a better life may include: wellness enjoyment, participation, contribution and opportunity. Personal - working with an individual’s goals no matter how well grounded, is pivotal in fostering commitment to recovery processes. Self-identified – imposing goals that are incongruent with the individual’s is simply counter-productive and diametrically opposed to the tenants of CR. Well formulated - using assessment toolsa that have credibility with a person may assist in discussing and formulating recovery goals. | Comprehensive – thorough and holistic, not adopting a pathological view of SMI, but unashamedly a comprehensive appraisal of relevant factors to assist in the formulation of a collaborative recovery plan. Multiple domains - may include: medication, treatment, co-morbidity, substance-use, physical & cognitive issues, coping, daily living skills, living arrangements, education & employment, family interactions, social, sexual and existential needs & stage of change. Function oriented – may include an array of issues in domains of functioning, activity & participation, role & impact on environmental and personal factors. Promoting hope – the knowledge gleaned assists clinicians to work effectively with clients & their family in generating and validating hope. | Collaborative – may be developed using tools such as the MHRSa. Recovery-oriented plan outlines individual recovery needs and develops strategies dependent on motivation for change in specific domains. Evidence-based - guiding access to a range of interventions (e.g., cognitive remediation, skills training, family interventions, employment & education strategies), as well as support & environmental adaptation. Delivery methods - interventions may be detailed as concurrent, sequential, in individual or group settings, as well as identifying who participates (family, carers, friends, support workers). Coordinated – across clinical and non-clinical interfaces, as well as addressing the interaction of CR & pharmacological intervention. | Goal focused - related to a range of personal, social & environmental factors, not diagnosis dependent. Interventions assist in achieving goals & improving mental & physical health. Individually tailored –interventions are individually tailored but, to assist clinicians in recovery-oriented service provision, core interventions may be linked with domains of recovery (e.g., using the MHRSa). Integrated programs – provide a foundation for developing strategies and interventions. Core & elective programs operate in individual, group, milieu/residential and community settings. Structured – collaborative, goal focused, evidence-based and motivational to promote generalisation, and accommodate different learning styles and abilities. To support achievement, higher level therapy programs are run in parallel to compliment activity-based programs. | Aim to ensure the highest level of care & that: 1. Strategies are comprehensive, responsive & positive; 2. Support is available to the CR clinician at every step; 3. Continuity maintained through information sharing; 4. Concurrent interventions are implemented and monitored; 5. Early intervention strategies are available; 6. Multidisciplinary team skills are available; 7. Risks are quickly identified & resolved; 8. Interventions are evidence &/or practice-based; 9. Positive recovery-oriented outcomes are shared; 10. Care coordination facilitates high quality service; 11. Opportunities exist to build service networks and linkages; 12. Key performance indicators are discussed and reviewed. The review provides a forum to oversee, support & co-ordinate service delivery & maximise recovery possibilities. | |
Time demands - time intensive due to complexity of issues & need to ensure a positive and productive milieu. Recovery trajectories are complex & dynamic. Work contexts can be demanding, particularly when the time course is extensive & progress minimal. | Processes – innovative, recovery-focused, inclusive & holistic. Review should be led by a senior CR clinician due to complex processes & time-frames, & include client, family, peer-support & relevant agencies. Feedback informs goal development & collaborative interventions. | ||||
Recovery pathways - may be simple & linear or interspersed with minor setbacks, even relapse. Incremental recovery in some domains & profound in others. Gains may be interdependent. Numerous reiterations of CR processes may be required to trigger a decision to adopt a more inclusive & adaptive approach (e.g., for SMI & substance misuse). | Achievements – Clinical review can objectively affirm achievements; facilitate development of options &/or determine when another strategy is warranted; & aid making complex decisions regarding level of service need. Achievement of self-determination in several domains may require minimal short-term interventions accompanied by follow-up & review. |