Skip to main content

Table 3 Potential predictors associated with being admitted in logistic regression model (crude and adjusted odds ratios)

From: Psychiatric admissions from crisis resolution teams in Norway: a prospective multicentre study

Variables

Bivariate model

Multivariate model

 

Crude ORafor admission

95% CI

p c

Adjusted ORbfor admission

95% CI

p c

Team level

      

Opening hours (37.5/week = ref)

      

Team operates extended hours (70/week)

0.40

0.20–0.79

0.009

0.20

0.08–0.51

0.001

Team operates extended hours (75/week)

0.55

0.36–0.85

0.007

0.36

0.20–0.66

0.001

Team operates extended hours (86/week)

0.58

0.33–1.03

0.063

0.22

0.10–0.49

< 0.001

Number of team members

0.97

0.91–1.03

0.313

   

Full-time doctor as part of the team

0.89

0.49–1.61

0.691

   

Number of patients included

0.99

0.99–1.00

0.154

   

Focus on home treatment

1.39

0.79–2.44

0.256

   

Psychosis team in the catchment area

1.13

0.62–2.06

0.685

   

Accept self-referral

0.63

0.30–1.33

0.227

   

Authority to admit patients to acute in-patient wards

0.80

0.46–1.40

0.437

   

Patient level

      

Age

1.01

1.00–1.02

0.105

1.02

1.00–1.03

0.019

Gender

1.01

0.69–1.47

0.980

   

Living alone

0.95

0.64–1.40

0.786

   

Employed at present

0.51

0.31–0.82

0.006

   

Suicide risk (0 = ref):

      

 1 Passive death wishes or suicidal thoughts without death intention

1.47

0.92–2.34

0.104

2.29

1.29–4.07

0.005

 2 Concrete suicidal plans or self-injury, but without death intention

3.75

2.21–6.33

< 0.001

6.88

2.48–13.63

< 0.001

 3 Self-injury with death intention

2.15

0.78–5.88

0.138

3.22

0.78–13.39

0.108

Non-accidental self-injury (HoNOS 2) (0 = ref)

     

 1 Minor problem requiring no action

2.32

1.25–4.30

0.008

   

 2 Mild problem, but definitely present

2.09

1.04–4.20

0.040

   

 3 Moderately severe problem

2.75

1.43–5.28

0.002

   

 4 Severe to very severe problem

3.40

1.56–7.43

0.002

   

Substance misuse (HoNOS 3) (0 = ref)

     

 1 Minor problem requiring no action

1.27

0.68–2.38

0.459

   

 2 Mild problem, but definitely present

1.24

0.60–2.54

0.558

   

 3 Moderately severe problem

1.70

0.92–3.14

0.092

   

 4 Severe to very severe problem

1.84

0.68–5.00

0.232

   

Psychotic symptoms (HoNOS 6) (0 = ref)

     

 1 Minor problem requiring no action

1.87

0.99–3.55

0.056

3.28

1.54–6.98

0.002

 2 Mild problem, but definitely present

3.08

1.60–5.91

0.001

2.33

1.06–5.14

0.037

 3 Moderately severe problem

8.37

4.04–17.35

< 0.001

8.62

3.32–22.34

< 0.001

 4 Severe to very severe problem

16.46

4.97–54.55

< 0.001

30.83

5.74–165.60

< 0.001

Depressive symptoms (HoNOS 7)

      

 1 Minor problem requiring no action

0.75

0.36–1.54

0.428

   

 2 Mild problem, but definitely present

0.94

0.50–1.77

0.847

   

 3 Moderately severe problem

1.38

0.71–2.69

0.350

   

 4 Severe to very severe problem

2.77

1.17–6.57

0.021

   

Physical attacks on others

1.11

0.58–2.14

0.746

   

Psychiatric admission past 12 months

3.85

2.42–6.13

< 0.001

2.69

1.58–4.57

< 0.001

Contact/support from CMHCs in the past 48 hours

3.09

1.63–5.85

0.001

3.78

1.56–9.21

0.004

Self-referral

0.75

0.48–1.19

0.220

   

Delivered to CRT by the police

4.00

1.81–8.85

0.001

   
  1. acrude odds ratios (bivariate analyses); badjusted odds ratios from a multivariate model reduced by stepwise selection method using Akaike’s information criterion; c asterisks on p-values indicate significant predictors after Holm’s adjustment for family-wise error rates was applied.