Parameter estimates | SEM coefficient | Standard Error | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Wife’s PCMDs |  |  |  |
  Intimate partner violence | 0.26 | 0.12 | 0.02 |
  Husband PCMD and AD |  |  |  |
   Neither PCMD nor AD | (reference) |  |  |
   Comorbid PCMD and AD | 5.5 | 4.5 | 0.22 |
   Only PCMD | 0.04 | 0.3 | 0.89 |
   Only AD | -0.10 | 132 | 0.99 |
  Province: Ha Nam | 0.56 | 0.2 | 0.03 |
  (Wife) Affectionate and trusting relationship with own mother: No | 0.66 | 0.2 | 0.008 |
  (Wife) Coincidental life adversity: Yes | 1.01 | 0.3 | <0.001 |
  (Wife) Fear of other family members: Yes | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.47 |
Intimate partner violence | Â | Â | Â |
  Husband PCMD and AD |  |  |  |
   Neither PCMD nor AD | (reference) |  |  |
   Comorbid PCMD and AD | 5.68 | 1.3 | <0.001 |
   Only PCMD | 0.37 | 0.6 | 0.58 |
   Only AD | 0.28 | 167 | 0.99 |
(Husband) age (in years) | -0.07 | 0.04 | 0.11 |
  (Husband) education: Year 9 and less | 0.09 | 0.68 | 0.89 |
  (Husband) permanent income: Yes | 0.33 | 0.58 | 0.57 |
  (Wife) Affectionate relationship with mother-in-law: No | 0.9 | 0.55 | 0.10 |
  First child: Yes | 1.04 | 0.8 | 0.19 |
  Household wealth index: Low | 0.72 | 0.7 | 0.36 |
Intimate partner violence defined by | Â | Â | Â |
  Wife’s perception of control from her husband (wife’s IBM Control score) | 1.00 |  |  |
  Care from husband to wife (wife’s IBM Care score) | -0.9 | 0.28 | 0.001 |
  Fear of or experience of physical abuse from the husband | 0.43 | 0.12 | <0.001 |
Effect from husband comorbid PCMD and AD to probability of wife’s PCMDs |  |  |  |
  Indirect effect via intimate partner violence | 1.50 |  | 0.02 |
  Direct effect | 5.54 |  | 0.23 |
Thresholds | Estimate | Â | Â |
  Wife’s PCMD | 1.07 |  |  |
  Intimate partner violence | 1.70 |  |  |
Fit indices | Estimates | Â | Â |
  χ2/df (p-value) | 41.5/49 (p=0.767) |  |  |
  RMSEA (Probability RMSEA <= .05) | <0.001 (p=0.99) |  |  |
  CFI | 1.00 |  |  |
  TLI | 1.00 |  |  |