Skip to main content

Table 1 Goodness-of-Fit Indices of Latent Profile Models Comprising One to Five Classes (N = 245)

From: The association of different parenting styles among depressed parents and their offspring’s depression and anxiety: a cross-sectional study

No. of profiles

AIC

BIC

aBIC

Entropy

LRT

BLRT

n(%)

Profile 1

Profile 2

Profile 3

Profile 4

Profile 5

1

5646.467

5702.487

5651.768

        

2

5212.825

5300.35

5221.108

0.801

451.462*

− 2807.233***

131(53.46%)

114(46.54%)

   

3

5080.305

5199.347

5091.570

0.829

150.520

− 2581.412***

52(21.22%)

123(50.20%)

70(28.57%)

  

4

4983.342

5133.896

54,997.589

0.854

114.963

− 2506.152***

21(8.57%)

53(21.63%)

59(24.08%)

112(45.71%)

 

5

4892.972

5075.037

4910.201

0.872

108.370

− 2448.671***

5(2.04%)

16(6.53%)

106(43.27%)

65(26.53%)

53(21.63%)

  1. AIC Akaike information criterion, BIC Bayesian information criterion, aBIC adjusted Bayesian information criterion, LRT Lo-Mendell–Rubin likelihood ratio test, BLRT bootstrapped likelihood ratio test. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001