Skip to main content

Risk assessment of paternal depression in relation to partner delivery during COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic and relevant prevention and control measures may affect the mental health and induce depressive symptoms in fathers with concurrent partner delivery exposure. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of depression in fathers with simultaneous exposure to COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of family functions on paternal perinatal depression (PPD) risk.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among the perinatal fathers recruited in a large tertiary hospital in Wuhan across the whole pandemic period from 31 December 2019 to 11 April 2020. Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and APGAR family function scale were used to evaluate PPD and family function, respectively. Chi-square test and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression model were applied for data analysis.

Results

Among the 1187 participants, the prevalence of PPD was 13.82% throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared with that in the time period before the announcement of human-to-human transmission on 19 January 2020, the depression risk was significantly lower during the traffic restriction (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.86) and public transportation reopening periods (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.59). Poor/fair family functions was associated with elevated depression risk (OR = 2.93, 95% CI: 1.90, 4.52). Individuals reporting a low family income and smoking had high depression risks.

Conclusions

A declined risk of PPD was observed over the traffic restriction period of the COVID-19 pandemic. An improved family function may help alleviate the risk of PPD during the pandemic. Health authorities are recommended to formulate targeted prevention and control strategies to handle PPD.

Peer Review reports

Background

Parent mental health status is important in offspring development [1, 2]. Although maternal perinatal depression is widely studied, research on paternal perinatal depression (PPD) is inadequate. This condition has become an international public health concern because it may affect the well-being of individuals, their partners and offspring. PPD affects maternal depression [3] and contributes to increased risks of physical [4, 5], behavioural [6], and emotional problems among offspring [7, 8].

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan, Hubei province, China and has since spread worldwide. In addition to the direct physical health impairment caused by viral infections, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic greatly threatens the mental health of pandemic-exposed individuals. The Chinese government promulgated the Guidance Manual on the Prevention and Control of Novel Coronavirus-Infection Pneumonia in the Community issued by the national government in response to the COVID-19 pandemic [9]. Hospitalized patients and their caregiver-companions are vulnerable to nosocomial COVID-19 infection, which may bring mental pressure on fathers in addition to the birth of new babies.

Home quarantine is implemented as an important measure to reduce human-to-human transmission in the COVID-19 control; however, this policy may also increase the role of family function among home-staying residents. Family function is an important reflection of social support. Insufficient social support during pregnancy could result in an increased risk of joint postnatal depression in mothers and fathers [10]. A systematic review reported the association between social support and PPD [11]. However, only a few studies focused on the prevalence of PPD and the role of family function during the COVID-19 pandemic.

To date, the prevalence and influential factors of PPD during the COVID-19 pandemic have never been addressed. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of PPD among the fathers exposed to the COVID-19 pandemic and to determine relevant risk factors. The findings provide new knowledge for the global prevention and control of PPD in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Research design and data collection

This study adopted a cross-sectional design and was conducted at a maternity care hospital located in Wuhan city, a tertiary hospital that is the largest maternal and childcare centre in the Hubei province. Data on family function, demographics and health behaviour factors were collected. Participants included men whose partners were hospitalized in their perinatal period (gestational age > 28 weeks and within 7 days after delivery) for delivery. Trained doctors and nurses introduced this survey to eligible individuals and obtained their oral agreement of participation from 31 December 2019 to 11 April 2020. A two-dimensional barcode of Questionnaire star (https://www.wjx.cn/) was provided to the participants and they could use their cellphone to fill in the survey in their spare time. Given that the nucleic acid detection method for COVID-19 was not fully developed in the early period of the pandemic, all participants were assumed to be not infected by COVID-19 when they had no clinical symptoms of COVID-19 including fever, respiratory symptoms and abnormal chest CT and had no history of direct contact with patients with COVID-19.

Exposure measurements

PPD status was used as a dependent variable and assessed using the Chinese version of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), which was compiled by Cox et al. in 1987 and is suitable for depression assessment because of its good reliability and validity [12]. The Chinese version of EPDS has been validated for paternal and maternal depressive symptoms [13, 14] and has been wildly used for fathers who may suffer depressive symptoms due to their partners’ antenatal and postnatal status [15, 16]. The scale consists of 10 items, each rated on a four-point scale ranging 0–3 by severity. A summary score of 10 points was used as a cut-off for PPD, which was reported as having a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 86% for Chinese fathers [17].

The pandemic time was divided into the following four periods to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on participants’ depression: (i) 1st period before the official announcement of human-to-human transmission by the National Health Commission of China on 19 January 2020 (31 December 2019 to 18 January 2020); (ii) 2nd period of thereafter to the day when traffic restrictions started (19–23 January 2020); (iii) 3rd period of thereafter to the day of zero newly confirmed COVID-19 cases report (24 January to 27 March 2020); and (iv) 4th period of thereafter to the day when public traffic transportations reopened (28 March to 11 April 2020). Family function was regarded as an important independent variable in relation to PPD and was examined using the APGAR scale, which was developed by Smilkstein and determined family function from five dimensions (adaptation, partnership, growth, affection and resolution) [18]. Each dimension was divided into three levels with scores from 0 (hardly ever) to 2 (almost always). A total score of 0–3, 4–6 and 7–10 are designated as poor, fair and good family functions, respectively.

Covariates

Demographics used as covariates included age (< 29, 30–34 and > 34 years), ethnicity (Han and others), education (junior high or below, senior high and college or more), urban/rural, family income of last year (< 50,000 RMB, 50,000–100,000 RMB, ≥100,000 RMB and unclear), insurance (yes or no) and first-time father (yes or no). Other covariates of health behaviour factors, including smoking/passive smoking within 1 year (yes or no) and exercise within 1 year (yes or no), were also examined.

Data analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 for Windows. Chi-square test was used to analyse the between-group differences of depression prevalence stratified by factors as the COVID-19 pandemic periods, family function, demographics (age, ethnicity, education, urban/rural, family income, insurance and first-time father), and health behaviour factors (smoking and exercise). Multiple logistic regression modelling was applied to analyse the dependency of prevalent depression on the mentioned explanatory variables. Model 1 included the periods of the COVID-19 pandemic and family function as independent variables. Model 2 analysed the associations of the COVID-19 pandemic, family function and depression risk in the adjustment of demographics. Model 3 involved health behaviour factors for covariate adjustment in addition to those in model 2. Results from multiple logistic regression analyses were reported as adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). All tests were two-sided, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

A total of 1341 participants were found eligible for this study. After the removal of individuals with incomplete questionnaires (n = 121) and patients with self-reported depression (n = 33), 1187 participants (88.52%) were finally included in the statistical analysis.

General characteristics of participants

The prevalence of PPD was 13.82% throughout the COVID-19 pandemic (Table 1). Among the participants, 44.65% were aged 30–34 years, most (97.56%) were of Han nationality and the majority (77.25%) finished education in a college or beyond. The participants educated with junior high or below had a relatively high proportion of PPD (22.22%). More than half (68.13%) of the participants lived in urban cities, and 51.90% had a family income of more than 100,000 RMB. Compared with the fathers with family income ≥100,000 RMB, those with family income < 50,000 RMB had higher proportion of PPD (24.20% vs 11.36%, p < 0.01). Approximately 93.43% of fathers had insurance, and those without insurance had a relatively higher proportion of PPD (28.21% vs 12.80%, p < 0.01). Almost two-thirds of the participants (67.31%) were first-time fathers and had significantly lower proportion of PPD than the others (11.83% vs 18.41%, p < 0.01).

Table 1 General characteristics of involved participants in this study

Less than half of the participants (41.16%) reported smoking during the past year and had higher proportion of PPD than those who did not smoke (18.45% vs 10.70%, p < 0.01). Approximately 64.94% of participants had a habit of exercise in the last year.

Independent variables

Table 2 and Fig. 1 show the prevalence of PPD during the four periods of the COVID-19 pandemic (31 December 2019 to 11 April 2020). The mean score of EPDS in the first period was 5.97 and the prevalence of PPD in the first period was significantly higher than that in the other three periods (19 January 2020 to 11 April 2020). Moreover, the majority of fathers (86.18%) reported good family function and had lower PPD than those who reported fair family function (11.53% vs 32.31%, p < 0.01).

Table 2 Descriptive statistics for independent variables of participants during the COVID-19 pandemic
Fig. 1
figure1

Response for ten Edinburgh postnatal depression scale questions during COVID-19 pandemic. 1st period: before the announcement of human-to-human transmission (31 December 2019 to 18 January 2020); 2nd period: from the announcement of human-to-human transmission to traffic restrictions (19–23 January 2020); 3rd period: Traffic restrictions (24 January 2020 to 27 March 2020); 4th period: Traffic restrictions dismissed (28 March 2020 to 11 April 2020)

Predictors of PPD

The participants had significantly lower PPD risk in the 3nd (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.86) and 4rd (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.14, 0.59) periods of the COVID-19 pandemic than in the 1st period (Table 3). Poor/fair family function was significantly associated with elevated PPD risk (OR = 2.93, 95% CI: 1.90, 4.52). The participants with low family income (< 50,000 RMB) had higher PPD risk than those with RMB 50,000–100,000 family income (OR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.15, 3.20). Smoking men were more likely to suffer PPD than those who did not smoke (OR = 1.65, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.35).

Table 3 Logistic regression analysis for the effects of independent variables on paternal perinatal depression

Discussion

This is a unique study evaluated the depression risk of fathers in relation to partner delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China. The prevalence of PPD was 13.82%, which is in line with a systematic review stating that the prevalence of PPD evaluated by EPDS (scores > 9) was 3.00–30.50% [19] but is higher than that reported by Rao et al. (10.12% in the third trimester and 8.98% in 1 month of postnatal) [20]. Various cultural factors, different assessment tools of depression and inconsistent perinatal period cut-off may result in the differences in the distinct prevalence of PPD. Consistent with previously reports, the current study showed that the occurrence of PPD was 11.83% among first-time fathers, which was higher than that among second-time fathers (18.41%) [21]. This phenomenon could be related to the high parenting responsibilities of second-time fathers.

Critically, our study revealed that the prevalence of PPD peaked to the highest before the human-to-human transmission announcement in the COVID-19 pandemic, and the traffic restriction led to a reduced depression risk. A similar result was observed among women who delivered at the Soroka University Medical Center [22]. The high risk of PPD early in the pandemic is attributed to the public concern of the obscure and uncertainty of the pandemic. As an effective measure against COVID-19 spread, traffic restriction might have helped in reducing PPD with a decreased likelihood of viral infection in their partners and babies. This finding indicated that effective prevention and control measures against the pandemic successfully aided in alleviating PPD.

Similar results were observed for the 10 items of EPDS. Specifically, fathers with thoughts of self-harm were at a high risk of self-harm behaviours and suicide. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report the decreased prevalence of self-harm ideation in fathers during the quarantine period. A previous work concentrated on the depression of pregnant women who showed high risks of depression and self-harm ideation during the COVID-19 outbreak in China [23]. Another systematic review failed to provide evidence on the increased self-harm ideation among general population during the COVID-19 pandemic [24]. This bias might be due to biological and psychosocial mechanisms of women who could be psychosocially vulnerable and have higher risk of self-harm ideation than men, especially for those in their perinatal period [25].

Family dysfunction is an important determinant of depression risks among adolescents [26], students [27], caregivers and patients [28] and the elderly [29]. Women’s satisfaction with family function is a protective factor against mental health disturbance [30]. This study further supported the observation that fathers who reported poor or fair family function had a high depression risk. Family function also served as a strong predictor of PPD (OR = 2.93). Wu et al. confirmed that family support is the most relevant factor of perinatal depression during the COVID-19 pandemic [23]. Measures against the COVID-19 pandemic including traffic restrictions and home quarantine forced fathers to stay with their family for longer time than usual. This situation could emphasize the importance of family function in the development of PPD during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future longitudinal studies are necessary to investigate the causal relationship between family function and PPD risk.

As another determinant of paternal depression, low household income contributed to increased depression risk among new fathers. This finding was in line with previous studies [31, 32]. The arrival of a new baby aggregates the financial pressure on new fathers. However, a relatively low number of fathers reported poor family income. This factor is dynamic, and the income of maternal partners during pregnancy is often reduced compared with that during the pre-pregnancy period. With the improvement of family income, the PPD risk may be considerably reduced.

Maternal depression is related to smoking before and within pregnancy [33,34,35]. In this study, fathers with active and passive smoking behaviours showed an elevated depression risk. This phenomenon could be partly explained by the neurobiological impact of nicotine intake through smoking on the brain part in charge of depression mood [36]. Patients with paternal depression could develop a habit of smoking, thus leading to the positive association between smoking and PPD.

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the cross-sectional design limited the causal relationship observation among factors. Secondly, data were self-reported, thereby possibly compromising the measurement accuracy of PPD and other related factors. Thirdly, the findings were only focused on targeted fathers in hospitals and cannot be generalized to those outside hospitals within the entire perinatal period. Fourthly, whether the women were in their prenatal or postnatal period when fathers participated in the survey has not been recorded. Moreover, this study drew conclusions based on findings from one hospital in Wuhan. Multi-centre studies are necessary to further address the issues related to PPD.

Conclusions

Depression in perinatal mothers has been widely studied, but that in fathers is underestimated. The mental health of mothers and fathers must be promoted. This work presented a declined risk of PPD over the traffic restriction period. An improved family function may help alleviate the risk of PPD during the pandemic. Household income and smoking were also found to be associated with PPD risk. These findings provide evidence for health authorities to formulate targeted prevention and control strategies against PPD in relation to partner delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus Disease 2019

EPDS:

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale

OR:

Odds Ratios

CI:

Confidence Intervals

PPD:

Paternal perinatal depression

References

  1. 1.

    Sweeney S, MacBeth A. The effects of paternal depression on child and adolescent outcomes: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2016;205:44–59. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.073.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Korja R, Nolvi S, Kataja EL, Scheinin N, Junttila N, Lahtinen H, et al. The courses of maternal and paternal depressive and anxiety symptoms during the prenatal period in the finnbrain birth cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0207856. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0207856.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sundström Poromaa I, Comasco E, Georgakis MK, Skalkidou A. Sex differences in depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95(1–2):719–30. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/jnr.23859.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Liu C, Cnattingius S, Bergström M, Östberg V, Hjern A. Prenatal parental depression and preterm birth: a national cohort study. BJOG. 2016;123(12):1973–82. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/1471-0528.13891.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Takehara K, Suto M, Kakee N, Tachibana Y, Mori R. Prenatal and early postnatal depression and child maltreatment among japanese fathers. Child Abuse Negl. 2017;70:231–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.06.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cui C, Li M, Yang Y, Liu C, Cao P, Wang L. The effects of paternal perinatal depression on socioemotional and behavioral development of children: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Psychiatry Res. 2020;284:112775. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gutierrez-Galve L, Stein A, Hanington L, Heron J, Ramchandani P. Paternal depression in the postnatal period and child development: mediators and moderators. Pediatrics. 2015;135(2):e339–47. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1542/peds.2014-2411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tichovolsky MH, Griffith SF, Rolon-Arroyo B, Arnold DH, Harvey EA. A longitudinal study of fathers' and young children's depressive symptoms. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018;47(sup1):S190–s204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on Issuing novel coronavirus infection pneumonia emergency psychological crisis intervention guidelines. Available at http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-01/27/content_5472433.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2020.

  10. 10.

    Nakamura A, Sutter-Dallay AL, El-Khoury Lesueur F, Thierry X, Gressier F, Melchior M, et al. Informal and formal social support during pregnancy and joint maternal and paternal postnatal depression: data from the French representative ELFE cohort study. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;66(5):431–41. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/0020764020911409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Recto P, Champion JD. Psychosocial factors associated with paternal perinatal depression in the United States: a systematic review. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020;41(7):608–23. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/01612840.2019.1704320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150(6):782–6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lee DT, Yip SK, Chiu HF, Leung TY, Chan KP, Chau IO, et al. Detecting postnatal depression in Chinese women. Validation of the Chinese version of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1998;172(5):433–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1192/bjp.172.5.433.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lai BP, Tang AK, Lee DT, Yip AS, Chung TK. Detecting postnatal depression in Chinese men: a comparison of three instruments. Psychiatry Res. 2010;180(2–3):80–5. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.07.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ierardi E, Ferro V, Trovato A, Tambelli R, Riva Crugnola C. Maternal and paternal depression and anxiety: their relationship with mother-infant interactions at 3 months. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019;22(4):527–33. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s00737-018-0919-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Top ED, Cetisli NE, Guclu S, Zengin EB. Paternal depression rates in prenatal and postpartum periods and affecting factors. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2016;30(6):747–52. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.apnu.2016.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zhang YP, Zhang LL, Wei HH, Zhang Y, Zhang CL, Porr C. Post partum depression and the psychosocial predictors in first-time fathers from northwestern China. Midwifery. 2016;35:47–52. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.midw.2016.01.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Smilkstein G. The family APGAR: a proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. J Fam Pract. 1978;6(6):1231–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cameron EE, Sedov ID, Tomfohr-Madsen LM. Prevalence of paternal depression in pregnancy and the postpartum: an updated meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;206:189–203. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jad.2016.07.044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rao WW, Zhu XM, Zong QQ, Zhang Q, Hall BJ, Ungvari GS, et al. Prevalence of prenatal and postpartum depression in fathers: a comprehensive meta-analysis of observational surveys. J Affect Disord. 2020;263:491–9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Da Costa D, Danieli C, Abrahamowicz M, Dasgupta K, Sewitch M, Lowensteyn I, et al. A prospective study of postnatal depressive symptoms and associated risk factors in first-time fathers. J Affect Disord. 2019;249:371–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jad.2019.02.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sade S, Sheiner E, Wainstock T, Hermon N, Yaniv Salem S, Kosef T, et al. Risk for depressive symptoms among hospitalized women in high-risk pregnancy units during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Med. 2020;9(8):2449. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm9082449.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wu Y, Zhang C, Liu H, Duan C, Li C, Fan J, et al. Perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms of pregnant women during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak in China. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):240.e241–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    John A, Okolie C, Eyles E, Webb RT, Schmidt L, McGuiness LA, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: a living systematic review. F1000Res. 2020;9:1097.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Doi S, Fujiwara T. Combined effect of adverse childhood experiences and young age on self-harm ideation among postpartum women in Japan. J Affect Disord. 2019;253:410–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lin HC, Tang TC, Yen JY, Ko CH, Huang CF, Liu SC, et al. Depression and its association with self-esteem, family, peer and school factors in a population of 9586 adolescents in southern Taiwan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;62(4):412–20. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2008.01820.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhao S, Yiyue G. The effects of mother's education on college student's depression level: the role of family function. Psychiatry Res. 2018;269:108–14. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Han SH, Kim B, Lee SA. Contribution of the family environment to depression in korean adults with epilepsy. Seizure. 2015;25:26–31. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.seizure.2014.11.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zou C, Chen S, Shen J, Zheng X, Wang L, Guan L, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of depressive symptoms among elderly inpatients of a chinese tertiary hospital. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:1755–62. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2147/CIA.S170346.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sprusińska E. The family APGAR index: study on relationship between family function, social support, global stress and mental health perception in women. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1994;7(1):23–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Dismuke CE, Egede LE. Association between major depression, depressive symptoms and personal income in us adults with diabetes. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2010;32(5):484–91. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gerogianni G, Lianos E, Kouzoupis A, Polikandrioti M, Grapsa E. The role of socio-demographic factors in depression and anxiety of patients on hemodialysis: an observational cross-sectional study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(1):143–54. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11255-017-1738-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Smedberg J, Lupattelli A, Mårdby AC, Øverland S, Nordeng H. The relationship between maternal depression and smoking cessation during pregnancy--a cross-sectional study of pregnant women from 15 european countries. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015;18(1):73–84. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s00737-014-0470-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    De Wilde KS, Trommelmans LC, Laevens HH, Maes LR, Temmerman M, Boudrez HL. Smoking patterns, depression, and sociodemographic variables among flemish women during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Nurs Res. 2013;62(6):394–404. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/NNR.0b013e3182a59d96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tong VT, Farr SL, Bombard J, DʼAngelo D, Ko JY, England LJ. Smoking before and during pregnancy among women reporting depression or anxiety. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):562–70. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001595.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tojal C, Costa R. Anxiety and depression symptoms among pregnant women with different smoking habits. Psychol Health Med. 2020;25(4):410–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/13548506.2019.1634820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to all the medical staff of the Department of Obstetrics for their responsible work during the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure the safety of maternal inpatients.

Funding

The work was funded by the National Science Foundation of China [Grant nos. 72061137006]. The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GS and QW contributed equally. GS: design, data collection, and edit the manuscript. QW: data analysis, data interpretation, and literature search. SW: literature search, manuscript revision. YC: draft the manuscript, design, data collection, and data analysis. All of authors gave final approval of the version to be submitted, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yao Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment. The survey was approved by the Ethics Committee of Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

We declare that the authors have no potential competing interests. We confirm that the participants and the survey used in our study have not been previously been published elsewhere by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Gq., Wang, Q., Wang, Ss. et al. Risk assessment of paternal depression in relation to partner delivery during COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China. BMC Psychiatry 21, 327 (2021). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12888-021-03325-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Paternal perinatal depression
  • COVID-19
  • Traffic restriction
  • Family function
  • Risk factors