Skip to main content

Table 3 Results from linear spline models for Psychodynamic Functioning Scales, Beck Depression Inventory, and Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale

From: The first experimental study of transference work–in teenagers (FEST–IT): a multicentre, observer- and patient-blind, randomised controlled component study

Dependent variable

Estimate

SE

CI (95%)

Df

F-value

t

p

Psychodynamic functioning scale

From pre- to post-treatment

  Time a

1.7

.39

.92 to 2.5

62.0

46.5

4.3

.000

  Time x treatment b

.21

.50

−.79 to 1.2

58.1

.18

.67

.674

Post-treatment to one-year follow-up

  Time a

.37

.21

−.05 to .78

47.3

17.8

1.8

.083

  Time x treatment b

.41

.27

- .13 to .96

47.0

2.3

1.5

.134

Beck Depression Inventory

From pre-treatment to 12 weeks

  Time a

−10.1

2.0

−14.0 to −6.1

65.1

43.8

−5.1

.000

  Time x treatment b

2.8

2.5

−2.2 to 7.9

61.6

1.2

1.1

.270

From 12 weeks to one-year follow-up

  Time a

−.83

.30

−1.4 to −.23

55.9

39.4

−2.8

.008

  Time x treatment b

−.91

.38

−1.7 to −.14

48.6

5.6

2.4

.022

MADRS

From pre-treatment to 12 weeks

  Time a

−9.5

15

−12.5 to −6.5

59.7

60.4

−6.3

.000

  Time x treatment b

1.9

1.8

−1.7 to 5.5

49.6

1.1

−1.0

.390

From 12 weeks to one-year follow-up

  Time a

−.22

.25

−.72 to .29

49.6

15.8

−.87

.302

  Time x treatment b

−.91

.33

1.6 to .23

45.8

7.4

2.7

.009

  1. Note: a. Change rate for the non-transference work group; b. Difference in change rates for the two treatment groups. For instance, during the second time period (from 12 weeks into treatment to one-year follow-up), BDI for the non-transference work group decreased by .83 points for every 10 weeks, and BDI for the transference work group had decreased by 1.74 points for every ten weeks (.83 + .91 points)