Table 2 Binary logistic regression analyses of associations between person and contextual determinants and mood swings among Thai adolescent in central region of Thailand (n = 2593)
Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SE | P-value | OR | SE | P-value | OR | SE | P-value | OR | SE | P-value | OR | SE | P-value | OR | |
Constant | .082 | .000 | .307 | .121 | .000 | .104 | .140 | .000 | .067 | .167 | .000 | .047 | .171 | .000 | .053 |
Personal level | |||||||||||||||
Sex | |||||||||||||||
Male Ref | |||||||||||||||
Female | .097 | .971 | .996 | .104 | .435 | 1.085 | .106 | .122 | 1.179 | .110 | .017 | 1.299 | .111 | .011 | 1.325 |
Creative gender | .192 | .957 | 1.011 | .204 | .873 | .968 | .207 | .923 | 1.020 | .209 | .740 | 1.072 | .210 | .627 | 1.107 |
`Family history of mental problems and illness | |||||||||||||||
No ref | |||||||||||||||
Yes | .147 | .000 | 2.042 | .157 | .000 | 2.062 | .159 | .000 | 1.985 | .160 | .000 | 1.969 | .161 | .000 | 1.959 |
Uncertain | .120 | .000 | 1.716 | .127 | .000 | 1.588 | .130 | .002 | 1.495 | .130 | .002 | 1.500 | .131 | .003 | 1.481 |
Bullying Involvement (base=below median) | -2LL = 2955.34 χ 2 =36.88, df= 4, p <.001 Classification accuracy =73.6 AIC = 2959.34 | .101 | .000 | 2.381 | .103 | .000 | 2.273 | .103 | .000 | 2.267 | .103 | .000 | 2.281 | ||
Social media use | |||||||||||||||
Normal Ref | |||||||||||||||
Trend to impact | .101 | .000 | 2.394 | .103 | .000 | 2.240 | .104 | .000 | 2.272 | .104 | .000 | 2.251 | |||
Get impact/problems | .201 | .000 | 5.080 | .205 | .000 | 4.158 | .206 | .000 | 4.174 | .206 | .000 | 4.081 | |||
Substance use in past 3 months (base=No) | |||||||||||||||
Tobacco | .310 | .980 | 1.008 | .310 | .803 | .926 | .314 | .624 | .857 | .315 | .511 | .813 | |||
Alcohol | .136 | .772 | .961 | .138 | .513 | .914 | .140 | .455 | .901 | .140 | .504 | .911 | |||
Energy drinking | .135 | .210 | 1.185 | .138 | .209 | 1.189 | .138 | .206 | 1.191 | .138 | .224 | 1.183 | |||
Illicit substance | .236 | .017 | 1.751 | .239 | .052 | 1.593 | .240 | .045 | 1.618 | .242 | .054 | 1.592 | |||
Contextual level | |||||||||||||||
Family structure | -2LL = 2689.78 χ 2 =302.44, df= 11, p <.001 Classification accuracy =75.3 AIC = 2705.78 | ||||||||||||||
Parents are together Ref | |||||||||||||||
Single parent | .103 | .122 | 1.172 | .103 | .126 | 1.171 | .104 | .146 | 1.162 | ||||||
Father/mother remarried | .260 | .895 | 1.035 | .260 | .981 | 1.006 | .261 | .945 | 1.018 | ||||||
Foster | .501 | .466 | .694 | .507 | .333 | .612 | .509 | .305 | .594 | ||||||
Family circumstance: Expressed emotion in family (Ref=below median) | .100 | .000 | 2.228 | .101 | .000 | 2.175 | .101 | .000 | 2.178 | ||||||
Education Program | -2LL = 2620.01 χ 2 =372.21, df= 15, p <.001 Classification accuracy =75.5 AIC = 2640.01 | ||||||||||||||
High school Ref | |||||||||||||||
Vocational school | .102 | .053 | 1.219 | .194 | .231 | .793 | |||||||||
Location of school | |||||||||||||||
Sub-urban Ref | |||||||||||||||
Urban | .118 | .058 | 1.250 | .153 | .856 | 1.028 | |||||||||
Bangkok | .138 | .001 | 1.566 | .195 | .396 | 1.180 | |||||||||
Location of school* Education Program | -2LL = 2601.24 χ 2 =390.98, df= 18, p <.001 Classification accuracy =77 AIC = 2625.24 | ||||||||||||||
Sub-urban*High school Ref | |||||||||||||||
Urban* Vocational school | .247 | .023 | 1.756 | ||||||||||||
Bangkok* Vocational sc. | .282 | .013 | 2.009 | ||||||||||||
-2LL = 2593.7 χ 2 =398.53, df= 20, p <.001 Classification accuracy =76.7 AIC = 2619.7 | |||||||||||||||