| Weak-not-sick | Dangerous/unpredictable | Social distance |
---|
B
| β | 95% CI |
p
|
B
| β | 95% CI |
p
|
B
| β | 95% CI |
p
|
---|
Extraversion | 0.429 | 0.157 | 0.268 | 0.590 | 0.000 | 0.146 | 0.046 | −0.056 | 0.347 | 0.157 | 0.035 | 0.011 | −0.168 | 0.239 | 0.733 |
Agreeableness | −0.350 | −0.088 | − 0.587 | − 0.113 | 0.004 | −0.467 | − 0.102 | −0.764 | − 0.170 | 0.002 | − 0.619 | − 0.137 | − 0.918 | − 0.319 | 0.000 |
Conscientiousness | 0.081 | 0.026 | −0.096 | 0.259 | 0.370 | 0.059 | 0.016 | −0.163 | 0.282 | 0.600 | 0.251 | 0.070 | 0.026 | 0.475 | 0.028 |
Neuroticism | −0.101 | −0.033 | −0.281 | 0.078 | 0.269 | 0.152 | 0.043 | −0.073 | 0.377 | 0.185 | 0.238 | 0.068 | 0.011 | 0.465 | 0.040 |
Openness | −0.340 | −0.105 | −0.534 | − 0.146 | 0.001 | − 0.421 | −0.112 | − 0.664 | −0.178 | 0.001 | −0.419 | − 0.113 | −0.664 | − 0.174 | 0.001 |
- aB – unstandardized coefficient;
- bβ – standardized coefficient;
- cControlled for socio-demographics (i.e. age, gender, ethnicity, education level, monthly income, and type of study) + contact experiences (i.e. close contact and non-close contact) + vignette-associated variables (i.e. vignette type and the status whether the participants could correctly recognize the mental disorder in the assigned vignette);
- dClose contact was significant in predicting ‘dangerous/unpredictable’ (B = − 0.439, p = 0.032), and ‘social distance’ (B = − 0.800, p < 0.001);
- eNon-close contact was significant in predicting ‘weak-not-sick’ (B = − 0.495, p = 0.001), ‘dangerous/unpredictable’ (B = − 0.369, p = 0.041), and ‘social distance’ (B = − 0.539, p = 0.003);
- fCorrect identification of the mental disorder in the vignette was significant in predicting ‘weak-not-sick’ (B = − 0.372, p = 0.028), ‘dangerous/unpredictable’ (B = 0.460, p = 0.031), and ‘social distance’ (B = 0.510, p = 0.018)