Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Psychoactive substance use among first-year students in a Botswana University: pattern and demographic correlates

  • 1Email author,
  • 2,
  • 3 and
  • 1
BMC Psychiatry201818:270

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1844-2

  • Received: 27 March 2018
  • Accepted: 13 August 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Substance use amongst university students is a recognized problem worldwide. Few studies have been carried out in this group in Botswana. These studies have been mostly limited to the use of alcohol and tobacco. Therefore, this study was designed to investigate the pattern of general substance use, its association with psychological distress and common socio-demographic factors among first-year undergraduates in a Botswana University.

Methods

A total of 401 students were interviewed using a modified W.H.O. student drug use questionnaire and the 12 item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ12) to assess the pattern of psychoactive substance use and its relationship with psychological distress amongst university students in Botswana.

Results

Alcohol was the most (31.9%) commonly used psychoactive substance. Age of debut for most psychoactive substances was between the ages of 15–18 years. Current use of alcohol (p = 0.045), amphetamine-type stimulants (p = 0.004) and benzodiazepines (p = 0.021) were associated with significant psychological distress. A positive relationship was observed between low participation in religious activities and substance use (OR = 4.63, 95%CI: 2.03–10.51), while a negative association was observed between not having a friend who uses drugs and substance use (OR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.19–0.99).

Conclusions

There is a significant substance abuse problem in the undergraduate population in Botswana. Our findings followed the global trend, with alcohol being the most commonly used substance. Religious participation demonstrates potential to be one of the solutions to this problem, but how to harness its seemingly protective influences is a field for further study.

Keywords

  • Substance use
  • Risk factors
  • Psychological distress
  • University students
  • Botswana

Background

For several centuries, psychoactive substances have been widely used all over the world for various reasons. Alcoholic beverages for example, have played significant social, economic, political, and traditional roles in many civilizations in Europe, America, and Africa [1]. Several other psychoactive substances have been used in societies for one medicinal purpose or the other. Cannabis use for its medicinal properties is believed to have started in China over 4000 years ago [1].

Despite the medicinal benefits of some psychoactive substances and their social acceptability, they are related to some undesirable health, social, legal and economic outcomes [2]. Tobacco accounts for 8.8% (4.9 million) deaths and 4.1% (59.1million) of Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs), while illicit drugs such as opioids, 0.4% of deaths and 0.8% of DALYs [2]. Of concern is the increasing relationship between HIV/AIDS infection, violence and substance abuse. In Botswana, heavy use of alcohol has been found to be associated with higher odds of all risky sex behaviors, gender-based violence and HIV transmission in both genders [3]. Furthermore, the relationship between substance use and psychological distress has been demonstrated using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) and other psychological instruments [4, 5].

Initiation to substance use mostly starts between the ages of 12 and 24 years and males are more susceptible than females, although this gap narrows as the age of initiation increases [4, 6]. The usual ages of entry into the university especially in this part of the world coincide with the ages of drug initiation, and for some youths, their first contact is during their university education. University life especially the early part has been described as a “transitional” period during which students move from a restricted high school life, mostly supervised by parents, to a more independent life which may be readily influenced by a liberal campus environment [7]. Some other factors that may predispose to drug use among undergraduates include academic pressure, peer pressure, easy accessibility, and unhealthy family background [8]. Alcohol and tobacco are often the first to be initiated of all the psychoactive substances [6, 9]. Alcohol is the most widely used psychoactive substances across the globe, accounting for 90.8% [9]. Except for the United States of America, Brazil, Mexico, Denmark and Spain where cannabis use ranked second, tobacco is the second most commonly consumed drug in most countries [9]. Studies conducted among university undergraduates from different parts of Africa gave similar results [4, 10].

Previous studies conducted in Botswana have only reported on the use of alcohol and tobacco [1113], which may lead to an erroneous assumption that these are the only drugs abused. Nonetheless, the fact that tobacco has been regarded as a gateway drug [14] suggests the existence of use of other unreported psychoactive substances. To explore this, we set out to investigate the pattern of substance use, its association with psychological distress, and common socio-demographic factors among undergraduates, using an instrument that measures a broader range of drugs. This study will not only add to the existing knowledge and provide a broader picture of substance use but should also identify areas for further research on drug use in Botswana.

Methods

The study was a cross-sectional descriptive study which assessed substance use among full-time first-year students of a tertiary institution in Botswana. The minimum sample size required was 373, but the research instruments were administered to 410 students based on the calculated minimum sample size with an additional 10% allowance for non-response.

The sampling method and procedure for distribution of questionnaires involved a multi-stage sampling technique (i.e., selection done in stages from faculties through departments until the final sampling units were arrived at). In the first stage, five faculties out of the existing seven faculties were selected by simple random technique (balloting). In the second stage, eight departments were randomly selected from 5 faculties, with one department each from two faculties and two from the remaining three selected faculties which have more departments. In the third stage, about 51 respondents were selected from first-year students in each of the preselected departments.

This study was conducted after obtaining ethical approval from the University of Botswana Research and Ethical Review Committee. The approval to embark on the study was given based on the assurance that the name of the study site (institution) would not be used in the publication. A written informed consent was also obtained from everyone who agreed to participate in the study.

Two research instruments were used for the present study. The first consisted of a modified version of the 37 item World Health Organization (WHO) drug questionnaire. The WHO developed the prototype in conjunction with the United Nations Division of Narcotics; the International Narcotics Control Board and the International Council on Alcohol and Addictions. It was designed to aid in epidemiological data collection on drug abuse across different geographical regions of the world, and it is recommended for use among students and other populations. Items in the questionnaire consist of different types of psychoactive/illicit substances, such as Cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, opioids, and sedatives. Specific examples relevant to this environment were given for the classes of drugs for simplicity. For example, drugs such as methylphenidate (Ritalin), khat, and crystal-meth were cited in the case of amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS). Participants were also asked to include other forms of drugs not listed in the examples. It measures the lifetime, 12-month and current use (i.e., in the last 30 days) of these psychoactive substances. It also consists of relevant questions on the socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents such as age, religious participation, ethnicity, position in the family, parents’ marital status, parents’ level of education and occupation. Religious participation was measured by frequency of attendance of religious activities, where a subjective response of “never” or “rarely” were grouped as poor participation and “regularly” as good participation. A fictional drug ‘maladrine’ was added to the list of psychoactive substances. Those who agreed to have taken this fictional substance were excluded from further analysis to reduce the bias of over-reporting.

The second instrument comprised of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ − 12), was used to assess the presence of psychological distress in the students. The GHQ-12 is a 12 item screening device for identifying minor psychiatric disorders in the general population and is suitable for adolescents and young adults. It has been found to have good internal consistency across many cultures as reflected by Cronbach’s alpha range from 0.82–0.89 in regions as diverse as Africa, Asia, Europe and South-America [1517]. Each question has four possible responses; the respondent was asked to choose only one response which best fits how he/she felt recently. The first two responses were scored “0” while the last two were scored “1” each. A score of 1 on each item was considered positive and a score of 0, negative. Positive scores were indicative of psychological distress. The cut-off of 3 was derived from the calculated GHQ mean score; hence, a score of 3 or more was used in this study to indicate psychological distress as in a previous study in a similar setting [4].

Data Analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS for Windows), Version 16. Frequency tables were employed for descriptive statistics such as the socio-demographic variables and prevalence of drug use. Cross-tabulations were done to show the prevalence of substance use by gender, and the relationships between substance use and GHQ score. A bivariate analysis was performed to explore the relationship between identified socio-demographics and current use of any substance. To further explore this relationship, the significant variables on bivariate analysis were entered into a binary logistic regression, with current use of any substance as the dependent variable. Fishers Exact Test (FET) was used where applicable. The level of statistical significance for all tests was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents

Out of 410 students interviewed, only 401 (97.8%) responses were analyzed. The remaining nine were excluded for admitting to the use of fictional drug, ‘maladrine,’ that was intentionally included to forestall over-reporting, and for incomplete responses. The mean age of the respondents was 20.8 (SD =1.4) years, while the age range was 18–24 years. More female students (50.4%) participated in the study than males (49.6%). Over half (58%) of the participants came from the Tswana ethnic group. Christianity was the most predominant religion (63.6%), followed by African traditional religion (18.9%), and others (8.8%), such as Hinduism and Buddhism. More than two-thirds of the respondents participated regularly in religious activities and received monthly allowance below150 USD (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents

Variable

Statistic

 

Age, years; mean (sd)

20.8 (1.4)

 

Age range

18–24 years

 
 

Frequency N

Percent

Age groupa

391

100

 <  21 years

219

56.0

 21–25 years

164

41.9

 >  25

8

2.0

Gender

401

100

 Male

199

49.6

 Female

202

50.4

Religiona

396

100

 Christianity

252

63.6

 Islam

11

2.8

 Traditional religion

75

18.9

 Others

35

8.8

 No religious affiliation

23

5.8

Religious participation

389

100

 Rare or low religious participation

89

22.9

 Regular participation

300

77.1

Ethnicity

393

100

 Tswana

229

58.3

 Kalanga

122

31.0

 Others

15

3.9

 Foreigners

27

6.9

Monthly Upkeepsa

347

100

 Below 130 USD

97

28.0

 130–150 USD

199

57.3

 Above 150 USD

51

14.7

aN = n not equal to 401 due to missing data

Prevalence and pattern of drug use

The lifetime prevalence of any substance use (defined as at least a single episode of use) was 59.6%, 12-months prevalence (previous year) was 49.4% while the current use was 37.9%. The lifetime prevalence of multiple drug use, technically defined as the use of more than one psychoactive substance, was 45.1%, 12-months (previous year) was 42.4% and current use 36.4%. Alcohol was the most commonly used psychoactive substance with 31.9% current users. Of these, beer (51.5%) and wine (26.6%) were the most frequent types. This was followed by tobacco which was 18.7% and cannabis, 6.2% (Fig. 1). Inhalants, which were majorly in the form of petrol and glue, were 3.2%. ATS, which comprised of methylphenidate, street drugs, crystal meth, and khat were 3.7%, while controlled drug such as benzodiazepines was 1.1%. Except for inhalants (FET, p < 0.01), no gender difference was observed in the rates of psychoactive substance use. Majority of the psychoactive substances were first tried between the ages of 15–18 years. None of the illegal drugs (cocaine, cannabis, heroin, and codeine) uses started before the age of 11 years, but most of those who use inhalants or solvents such as petrol started at the age of 10 (Table 2).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Showing the prevalence of psychoactive substance use among respondents. LSD - Lysergic acid diethylamide. ATS - Amphetamine-type stimulants

Table 2

Age at first use of drugs among respondents

Age at first drug use in years, n (%)

Drugs

Frequency (N)

10 or less

11–14

15–18

19 or more

Tobacco

120

6 (5.0)

24 (20.0)

54 (45.0)

36 (30.0)

Alcohol

200

14 (7)

17 (8.5)

93 (46.5)

76 (38.0)

Cannabis

45

3 (6.7)

20 (44.4)

22 (48.9)

Cocaine

4

3 (75.0)

1 (25.0)

ATS

33

5 (15.2)

2 (6.1)

8 (24.2)

18 (54.5)

Inhalants

17

11 (64.7)

3 (17.6)

1 (5.9)

2 (11.8)

Benzodiazepines

6

1 (16.7)

1 (16.7)

1 (16.7)

3 (50.0)

Heroin

1

1 (100)

Codeine

6

1 (16.7)

3 (50.0)

2 (33.3)

LSD

1

1 (100)

LSD lysergic acid diethylamide, ATS Amphetamine-type stimulants

Drug use and psychological distress

About 16% of the students had significant psychological distress, (defined as GHQ score of 3 and above). Current use of alcohol (χ2 = 4.03, p = 0.045), ATS (χ2 = 8.35, p = 0.004) and benzodiazepines (FET, p = 0.021) were associated with significant psychological distress. Similarly, lifetime use of benzodiazepines (FET, 0.005) and codeine (FET, 0.045) were associated with GHQ of 3 and above (Table 3).
Table 3

Respondents’ drug use and GHQ score

Drugs

GHQ score

GHQ (0–2) N (%)

GHQ (3–12) N (%)

χ2

p

Tobacco

 Current use

60 (87.0)

9 (13.0)

1.64

0.200

Alcohol

 Current use

104 (87.4)

15 (12.6)

4.03

0.045

Cannabis

 Current use

17 (70.8)

7 (29.2)

1.99

0.158

Cocaine

 Current use

3 (100)

 

0.99

ATS

 Current use

8 (53.3)

7 (46.7)

8.35

0.004

Inhalants

 Current use

11 (91.7)

1 (8.3)

0.82

0.360

Benzodiazepines

 Current use

1 (25.0)

3 (75.0)

 

0.021 *

ATS amphetamine-type stimulants

*FET = Fisher’s Exact Test. Significant p- value in italics

Factors that were associated with any substance use among university undergraduates

Factors that were significant on bivariate analysis were age 20 years and below (χ2 = 7.34, p = 0.007), poor participation in religious activities (χ2 = 33.8, p < 0.01), earning 150 USD and above per month (χ2 = 6.20, p = 0.013), having a father who smokes cigarette (χ2 = 6.81, p = 0.009), having a father who drinks alcohol (χ2 = 19.5, p = < 0.01), and having a friend who uses drugs (χ2 = 6.57, p = 0.010) (Table 4). With logistic regression analysis, only two of these variables were found to have significant relationships with any substance use. Poor participation in religious activities was positively related with any substance use (OR = 4.63, 95%CI: 2.03–10.51), not having a friend who uses drugs was negatively associated with any substance use (OR = 0.44, 95%CI: 0.19–0.99) (Table 5).
Table 4

Bivariate analysis showing the relationship between identified risk factors and any substance use

Variables

Any Substance use

Statistic

No

yes

N(%)

N(%)

df

χ2

P

Age (years)

149 (68.0)

70 (32.0)

1

7.34

0.007

 20 and below

94 (54.7)

78 (45.3)

   

 Above 20

     

Ethnicity

 Tswana

143 (62.4)

86 (37.6)

4

7.46

0.059

 Kalanga

78 (63.9)

44 (36.1)

   

 Others

12 (80.0)

3 (20.0)

   

 Non-citizens

11 (40.0)

16 (59.3)

   

Religion

 No religious affiliation

15 (65.2)

8 (34.0)

4

1.18

0.881

 Christianity

152 (60.3)

100 (39.7)

   

 Islamic religion

7 (63.6)

4 (36.4)

   

 African traditional religion

48 (64.0)

27 (36.0

   

 Others

24 (68.6)

11 (31.4)

   

Religious participation

 Rare or low religious participation

32 (36.0)

57 (64.0)

1

33.8

< 0.01

 Regular participation

210 (70.0)

90 (30.0)

   

Upkeep/month

 Below 150 USD

71 (73.2)

26 (26.8)

1

6.20

0.013

 150 USD and above

147 (58)

103 (41.2)

   

Father’s level of education

 Below secondary school

45 (67.2)

22 (32.8)

1

0.104

0.747

 Secondary school and above

130 (65.0)

70 (35.0)

   

Mother’s level of education

 Below secondary school

52 (58.4)

37 (41.6)

1

0.68

0.409

 Secondary school and above

181 (63.3)

105 (36.7)

   

Father’s employment status

 No employement

43 (63.2)

25 (36.8)

1

0.043

0.835

 Employed

137 (64.6)

75 (35.4)

   

Marital status of the parents

 Divorced

46 (58.2)

33 (41.8)

2

2.13

0.350

 Married and staying together

112 (66.7)

56 (33.3)

   

 Separated or never married

71 (60.2)

47 (39.8)

   

Father smoking cigarette

 No

112 (72.7)

42 (27.3)

1

6.81

0.009

 Yes

52 (56.5)

40 (43.5)

   

Father drinking alcohol

 No

91 (77.8)

26 (22.2)

1

19.5

< 0.01

 Yes

71 (51.1)

68 (48.9)

   

Mother smoking cigarette

 No

218 (62.5)

131 (37.5)

1

0.28

0.594

 Yes

6 (54.5)

5 (45.5)

   

Mother drinking alcohol

 No

203 (63.6)

116 (36.4)

1

0.78

0.378

 Yes

22 (56.4)

17 (43.6)

   

Friend using any substance

 No

200 (64.3)

111 (35.7)

1

6.57

0.010

 Yes

34 (47.9)

37 (52.1)

   

Significant p-value in italics

Table 5

Logistic regression showing the factors that are associated with substance use among students

Variables

Statistics

 

95% Confidence Interval

Wald

p-value

OR

lower

upper

Age (20 years and below)

0.10

0.757

1.11

0.57

2.19

Rare or low religious participation

13.4

< 0.001

4.63

2.03

10.51

Earn below 150 USD per month

0.04

0.851

0.93

0.43

1.99

Father does not smoke cigarette

0.53

0.467

0.75

0.35

1.61

Father does not drink alcohol

2.25

0.134

0.55

0.25

1.20

Does not have a friend abusing drug

3.96

0.047

0.44

0.19

0.99

Significant p-value in italics

Discussion

Drug use among undergraduates is as noteworthy a problem in Botswana as elsewhere [8, 1820] and has mainly been underreported. The present study, to our knowledge, was the first to determine the pattern of general drug use among university students in Botswana. The lifetime prevalence for any substance use was 59.6%; 12-month prevalence was 49.4% while the current use was 37.9%. These figures are within the range described in previous literature from the developed countries [9, 20, 21] and are similar to those found in Africa as well. For example in West Africa, the lifetime prevalence of any substance use ranged from 56 to 78% and 1-month prevalence, 28–40% among undergraduates [4, 8]. There was a high prevalence of multiple drug use among the respondents with 36.4% currently engaging in multiple drug use. Multiple drug use has been associated with higher rates of complications including rule-breaking behavior [22], sexual and physical abuse [3], and various other psychiatric disorders [5]. This relationship is complex and multidirectional. While this present study did not set out to assess the relationships between drug use and anti-social or high-risk behaviors, the finding of a high prevalence of multiple drug use may be an indication that this population is a high-risk group for complications of drug abuse.

As in many other studies on drug use in youths [4, 9, 20], alcohol was the most commonly used psychoactive substance with a current prevalence of 31.9%. The significant role of alcohol in many social functions, its wide availability and the social acceptability of its use, are reasons that have been adduced for this trend [8]. Production of alcohol (mostly from Sorghum) and its consumption has been an integral part of the culture and village life in Botswana, but consumption of alcoholic beverages was traditionally restricted to elders of the community [23]. Rapid industrialization and economic globalization have brought about sudden and extensive social transformations in the developing countries, including Botswana. Children and women who were previously excluded from drinking now constitute a significant proportion of consumers of these products [23]. However, our study revealed a lower prevalence than what was previously reported in Botswana, 58% [13], 44.4% [12] and Nigeria, 58% [4] among undergraduates. While we cannot make a direct comparison between the current study and the previously conducted studies in Botswana, it is possible that the 30% tax placed on its purchase is playing a significant role in the reduction of alcohol consumption in Botswana, as suggested by previous authors [24].

Tobacco was the next most commonly used psychoactive substance in this study group as reported elsewhere [4, 9, 20] with a current prevalence of 18.7%. This rate is much higher than the prevalence reported in the Global youth tobacco surveillance report from 2000 to 2007 (9.5%) [25] but similar to the rates from Europe (19.2%) and America (15%) [25]. The rate reported in this study is also lower than what was previously reported among teachers in Botswana. Although, the low prevalence among the teachers could have been related to Botswana legislation on tobacco control (Botswana Control of Smoking Act, 1992), which strictly prohibits any direct forms of tobacco advertising and use, it is possible that youths are less likely to follow this law. Moreover, only those who have recently completed their first 1 year on campus were included in the present study, and this may also explain the higher prevalence of tobacco use in this sample. First-year students often face significant challenges such as exposure to new courses, more liberal campus environment, peer pressure, securing accommodation, which may stretch their capacity to cope and engender substance use behavior. Among youths, alcohol and tobacco have been referred to as “soft drugs” taking into consideration that they are legal in most countries and also as “gateway drugs,” based on the trend of being the first psychoactive substance taken by many users before “graduating’ to other psychoactive substances [14]. The respondents in our study seem to maintain that pattern. It is, therefore, necessary to set up policies and programs targeted towards controlling the use of these “soft drugs” and prevent the progression to more dangerous drugs.

Consistent with the findings of the global report, cannabis was the most commonly used illicit substance with 9.2% admitting to using the substance within the last 12 months and 6.2% current users. The rate of those who have used the substance in the last 12 months is similar to what has been reported by previous authors from other countries [4, 10, 19, 21]. Nevertheless, the rates of other illicit and prescription drugs such as cocaine, codeine, ATS, and benzodiazepines are quite low as in other studies from Africa [4, 19], but unlike in the United States, where their uses have been reported to be on the increase [18, 20]. As in other African countries, it is possible that these substances are too expensive to procure and sustain in Botswana, especially by these individuals who mostly survive on stipends from the government.

It is important to note that, apart from inhalant use which was mainly a male-dominated affair, no gender difference was observed in the use of other substances. These findings suggest that drug use is not an entirely male-dominated activity in Botswana. Conversely, gender-based roles prescribed for women are protective against drug abuse behaviors in many communities [4, 23]. Men have been reported to be more likely to use tobacco and other illicit substances than women [4, 20, 22]. Perhaps, the nature of our sample is responsible for this disparity. In Botswana, due to the adoption of western social norms particularly amongst urban youths, there is a little cultural restriction against the use of psychoactive substances by females. This is evidenced by the open consumption of alcohol and tobacco without any apparent social censure. This practice is entirely different from some other regions in Africa, where such habits are deemed socially unacceptable [4, 26].

For most of the substances assessed the age range of debut was 15–18 years. This finding may indicate a critical window period for drug abuse prevention programs in the population. The substances which bucked this trend included solvents such as petrol (aged 10 or less), alongside ATS and benzodiazepines with a higher age of debut (19 and above). As it has been previously documented, this finding suggests that inhalants may play a role as a gateway drug as tobacco [27], and may require specific attention in any drug abuse prevention programs directed toward the pre-adolescent age group. The drugs which had a relatively lower age of debut, i.e., alcohol, tobacco, and inhalants are readily available in the community. Alcohol and inhalants are even more easily accessible for the pre-adolescents since alcohol is freely available in many African households and inhalants such as glue can be purchased without restrictions. Our finding demonstrates that universal preventive techniques that result in reduced availability and accessibility of such substances may likely result in reduced consumption and abuse of the substances. In addition to the tax and restriction of alcohol and cigarette sales to under-18’s, parents should also be educated on how to prevent access to these substances at home. Perhaps there should also be a restriction on sales of inhalants to children less than 18 years, as in alcohol and tobacco. There is increasing evidence suggesting that a lower age of debut is associated with a higher rate of problems with drug use ranging from dependence, other drug-related disorders to delinquency [6], and other mental disorders [5]. Thus, no effort should be spared in preventing minors from experimenting with psychoactive substances.

Current use of either alcohol or ATS was seen to be significantly associated with psychological distress in the current study. It is imperative to note that, the direction of the correlation cannot be assumed due to the cross-sectional nature of this study. Perhaps, the psychological distress contributed to or led to substance use, and not vice-versa. This assumption deserves further investigation. Even so, it has been established that despite the social acceptability of alcohol use, it still presents a public health concern. It is estimated that about 4% of all deaths worldwide are attributable to alcohol consumption along with 4.5% of the global disease and injury burden [28]. For example in Botswana, alcohol-impaired road traffic crashes are one of the leading causes of disabilities and deaths [24]. The impact of alcohol consumption on public health statistics cannot be overstated. There is a need to reduce alcohol accessibility and availability to adolescents. There may also be the need to make policies on the attractiveness of the packaging and to limit advertisements of alcoholic products similarly as it is being done for tobacco. The use of benzodiazepines and codeine were also significantly associated with psychological distress, albeit these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the sample size. These “Central Nervous System depressants” are in most cases prescription drugs diverted for recreational purposes through self-medication. These drugs are already highly regulated. There is, therefore, a need to enforce the existing regulations and improve them where necessary.

On bivariate analysis, participants whose fathers were not using any psychoactive substance (alcohol or tobacco), and those who live on less than 150 USD per month were less likely to use drugs. Studies have shown that parental substance use is a factor in substance use among their offspring [29]. For example, Kilpatrick et al. found an increased risk of substance abuse in adolescents who had family members with alcohol or drug use problem [30]. In the same vein, smoking in adolescents has been found to be associated with lower family socioeconomic status [31]. Cigarettes are cheaper and more accessible for students with little financial resources. Despite these finding, these variables, including age groups failed to predict psychoactive substance use in our sample on logistic regression.

Logistic regression showed that poor participation in religious activities was positively correlated with substance use while not having a friend who uses drugs was negatively correlated. This finding has been shown in studies elsewhere [32, 33]. In a study conducted among 12595 Brazilian university students, frequent participation in religious activities was shown to have a protective effect against substance use [32]. It is possible that participation in religious activities provides opportunities to interact with non-drug using peers. Since peer influence is at peak during adolescence [34], the negative correlation between not having a friend who uses drugs and substance use is thus not surprising. Peer group influence has been shown to be a factor in substance use [35] whereas, religious students have also been noted to be less prone to engage in risky behavior [36] such as drug abuse. How to harness these seemingly protective influences is a field for further study.

Conclusions

There is evidence that the use of psychoactive substances is a problem in the undergraduate population in Botswana. The most commonly used psychoactive substance was alcohol as elsewhere, but the government 30% tax policy on alcoholic beverages may have contributed to the relatively lower rate in the current study. There is a high rate of the early debut of inhalants, tobacco, and alcohol, which is possibly driven by their availability to pre-adolescents mainly. Poor participation in religious activities was positively correlated with substance use while not having a friend who uses drugs was negatively correlated. The role of religious participation in addressing drug abuse on campus should be further explored.

Recommendations

This study has demonstrated that there is a significant problem of drug use amongst youths in Botswana and it suggests a need for urgent action to reverse the trend. Proper orientation package should be designed for fresh students to enable them to adjust and adapt to the new stage of life very easily. School health policies should be adjusted to include programmes targeted towards drug education and counseling. Participation in religious activities appears to plays an important role in inhibiting the use of a psychoactive substance. Therefore, a conducive environment which encourages religious activities, and other adaptive ways of relieving stress should be encouraged in the university community.

Limitations and strengths

The study was conducted in one tertiary institution and may not be generalizable to the entire adolescent population of Botswana, particularly in the context of relatively low university enrolment. It was also cross-sectional descriptive and may not be able to determine causality of any of its findings. It is, however, the first to look at substance use generally and not a specific or few substances. It also attempted to see a relationship between substance use and the associated problems of psychological distress.

Future research

It will be necessary to conduct a similar study in the general youth population to see how the rates in this group compare with the general youth population. It will be helpful to assess the relationships between substance use and other associated problems like criminal offending and academic performance within this group and other similar groups. The role of religious participation in addressing drug abuse on campus should be further explored. There is also a need to conduct a prospective study on drug users particularly those with a lower age of debut to assess the relationship of age of debut with outcomes.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the students who participated in the study and all the staff who assisted in data collection.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

AAO developed the concept and designed the study. AAO and ET conducted the data collection and analysis. AAO drafted the initial manuscript. OO, ET, and PRO made substantial intellectual contributions to the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Botswana ethical committee (UBR/RES/IRB/1628). The purpose of the study was thoroughly explained to every eligible participant, and a written informed consent was obtained from everyone who agreed to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychiatry, University of Botswana Medical School, Private Bag, 00712 Gaborone, Botswana
(2)
Department of Psychiatry, Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomosho, Nigeria
(3)
University of Botswana Medical School, Gaborone, Botswana

References

  1. Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan & Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioural Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry. 9th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.Google Scholar
  2. World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva: World health Organization; 2009. Available from http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GlobalHealthRisks_report_full.pdf
  3. Phorano O, Nthomang K, Ntseane D. Alcohol abuse, gender-based violence and HIV/AIDS in Botswana: establishing the link based on empirical evidence. SAHARA J. 2005;2(1):188–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Babalola EO, Ogunwale A, Akinhanmi A. Pattern of psychoactive substance use among university students in south-western Nigeria. J Behav Health 2013;2(4):334–342. Available from: doi: https://doi.org/10.5455/jbh.20130921013013
  5. Armstrong TD, Costello EJ. Community studies on adolescent substance use, abuse, or dependence and psychiatric comorbidity. J Consult Clin Psychol 2002;70(6):1224. Available from: doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.70.6.1224
  6. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Rockville: The TEDS Report: Age of Substance Use Initiation among Treatment Admissions Aged 18 to 30; 2014. Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/WebFiles_TEDS_SR142_AgeatInit_07-10-14/TEDS-SR142-AgeatInit-2014.htm Google Scholar
  7. Olley BO. Child sexual abuse, harmful alcohol use and age as determinants of sexual risk behaviors among freshmen in a Nigerian University. Afr J Reprod Health. 2008;12(2):75–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Makanjuola AB, Daramola TO, Obembe AO. Psychoactive substance use among medical students in a Nigerian university. World Psychiatry. 2007;6(2):112.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Winstock, A R. Reflections on the results of the world’s biggest ever drug survey: The global drug survey. 2014. Available from: https://www.globaldrugsurvey.com/past-findings/the-global-drug-survey-2014-findings/ Google Scholar
  10. Peltzer K, Pharswana N. Substance use among south African students: a quantitative and qualitative study. Alcohol Drug Abuse Mod. 2008;7(3):112–22.Google Scholar
  11. Erick PN, Smith DR. Prevalence of tobacco smoking among school teachers in Botswana. Tob Induc Dis. 2013;11(1):24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Morutwa G, Plattner IE. Self-control and alcohol consumption among university students in Botswana. Afr J Drug Alcohol Stud. 2014;13(2):69–78.Google Scholar
  13. Mphele S, Gralewski C, Balogun S. Stress and alcohol use among college students: a case of Molepolole college. Stud J Hum Soc Sci. 2013;8(3):1–6.Google Scholar
  14. Saddichha S, Sinha BN, Khess CR. The role of gateway drugs and psychosocial factors in substance dependence in Eastern India. Int J Psychiatr Med 2007;37(3):257–266. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2190/PM.37.3.b
  15. Gelaye B, Tadesse MG, Lohsoonthorn V, Lertmeharit S, Pensuksan WC, Sanchez SE, Lemma S, Berhane Y, Vélez JC, Barbosa C, Anderade A. Psychometric properties and factor structure of the general health questionnaire as a screening tool for anxiety and depressive symptoms in a multi-national study of young adults. J Affect Disord. 2015;187:197–202.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Glozah FN, Pevalin DJ. Factor structure and psychometric properties of the general health questionnaire (GHQ-12) among Ghanaian adolescents. J Child Adol Mental Health. 2015;27(1):53–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacob KS, Bhugra D, Mann AH. General health Questionnaire-12: psychometric properties and factor structure among Indian women living in the United Kingdom. Indian J Psychiatry. 1997;39(3):196.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hasin DS, Saha TD, Kerridge BT, Goldstein RB, Chou SP, Zhang H, Jung J, Pickering RP, Ruan WJ, Smith SM, Huang B. Prevalence of marijuana use disorders in the United States between 2001-2002 and 2012-2013. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(12):1235–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Osman T, Victor C, Abdulmoneim A, Mohammed H, Abdalla F, Ahmed A, Ali E, Mohammed W. Epidemiology of substance use among university students in Sudan. J Addict. 2016;2016:2476164.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Swendsen J, Burstein M, Case B, Conway KP, Dierker L, He J, Merikangas KR. Use and abuse of alcohol and illicit drugs in US adolescents: results of the National Comorbidity Survey-Adolescent Supplement. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(4):390–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Eastwood P, Health and Social Care Information Centre. Statistics on drug misuse: England 2013. Leeds: Health and Social Care Information Centre. p. 2013.Google Scholar
  22. McClelland GM, Elkington KS, Teplin LA, Abram KM. Multiple substance use disorders in juvenile detainees. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2004;43(10):1215–1224. Available from: doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000134489.58054.9c
  23. Myadze TI, Rwomire A. Alcoholism in Africa during the late twentieth century: a socio-cultural perspective. Int J Bus Soc Sci. 2014;5(2)Google Scholar
  24. Sebego M, Naumann RB, Rudd RA, Voetsch K, Dellinger AM, Ndlovu C. The impact of alcohol and road traffic policies on crash rates in Botswana, 2004–2011: a time-series analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;70:33–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Warren CW, Jones NR, Peruga A, Chauvin J, Baptiste JP, Costa de Silva V, el Awa F, Tsouros A, Rahman K, Fishburn B, Bettcher DW. Global youth tobacco surveillance, 2000-2007. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008;57(1):1–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yunusa MA, Obembe A, Ibrahim T, Njoku CH. Prevalence and specific psychosocial factors associated with substance use and psychiatric morbidity among patients with HIV infection at Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto State, Nigeria. Afr J Drug Alcohol Stud. 2011;10(1)Google Scholar
  27. Omigbodun OO, Babalola O. Psychoactive substance misuse among Nigerian adolescents. Ann Afr Med. 2004;3:3.Google Scholar
  28. World Health Organization. Global status report on alcohol and health 2011. Geneva: Switzerland World Health Organization; 2011. Available from: http://libdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241564151_eng.pdf
  29. Chassin L, Pitts SC, DeLucia C, Todd M. A longitudinal study of children of alcoholics: predicting young adult substance use disorders, anxiety, and depression. J Abnorm Psychol. 1999;108(1):106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kilpatrick DG, Acierno R, Saunders B, Resnick HS, Best CL, Schnurr PP. Risk factors for adolescent substance abuse and dependence: data from a national sample. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(1):19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Patrick ME, Wightman P, Schoeni RF, Schulenberg JE. Socioeconomic status and substance use among young adults: a comparison across constructs and drugs. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012;73(5):772–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Gomes FC, Andrade AG, Izbicki R, Moreira-Almeida A, Oliveira LG. Religion as a protective factor against drug use among Brazilian university students: a national survey. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2013;35(1):29–37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wallace JM Jr, Bachman JG. Explaining racial/ethnic differences in adolescent drug use: the impact of background and lifestyle. Soc Probl. 1991;38(3):333–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Berndt TJ, Murphy LM. Influences of friends and friendships: myths, truths, and research recommendations. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2002;30:275–310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hodge DR, Cardenas P, Montoya H. Substance use: spirituality and religious participation as protective factors among rural youths. Soc Work Res. 2001;25(3):153–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Benson PL, Donahue MJ, Erickson JA. Adolescence and religion: a review of the literature from 1970 to 1986. Res Soc Scientific Stud Rel. 1989;1(1):153–81.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement