Table 5 Receiver operating curve analysis, likelihood ratios and predictive values of the STAR-MH
Score | Sensitivity % (95% CI) | Specificity % (95% CI) | PLR (95% CI) | NLR (95% CI) | PPV % (95% CI) | NPV % (95% CI) | Efficiency (95% CI) | Youden’s J |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 96.7% (88.7, 99.6) | 63.1% (54.2, 71.4) | 2.6 (2.1, 3.3) | 0.1 (0.0, 0.2) | 55.6% (45.7, 65.1) | 97.6% (91.7, 99.7) | 74.0% (67.1, 80) | 1.60 |
2 | 93.4% (84.1, 98.2) | 74.6% (66.2, 81.8) | 3.7 (2.7, 5) | 0.1 (0.0, 0.2) | 63.7% (53, 73.6) | 96% (90.2, 98.9) | 80.7% (74.4, 86.1) | 1.68 |
3 | 83.6% (71.9, 91.8) | 84.6% (77.2, 90.3) | 5.5 (3.6, 8.3) | 0.2 (0.1, 0.3) | 72.2% (60.4, 82.1) | 91.7% (85.2, 95.9) | 84.4% (78.5, 89.2) | 1.69 |
4 | 73.8% (60.9, 84.2) | 91.5% (85.4, 95.7) | 8.8 (4.9, 15.7) | 0.3 (0.2, 0.4) | 80.7% (68.1, 90) | 88.1% (81.5, 93.1) | 85.9% (80.2, 90.5) | 1.66 |
5 | 55.7% (42.4, 68.5) | 95.4% (90.2, 98.3) | 12.2 (5.4, 27.5) | 0.5 (0.3, 0.6) | 85.4% (70.8, 94.4) | 82.1% (75.1, 87.9) | 82.8% 76.7, 87.9) | 1.52 |
6 | 32.8% (21.3, 46) | 98.5% (94.6, 99.8) | 21 (5.1, 86.9) | 0.7 (0.6, 0.8) | 90.9% (70.8, 98.9) | 75.3% (68.1, 81.6) | 77.1% (70.5, 82.8) | 1.31 |
7 | 16.4% (8.2, 28.1) | 98.5% (94.6, 99.8) | 10.5 (2.4, 46.4) | 0.9 (0.8, 1.0) | 83.3% (51.6, 97.9) | 71.1% (63.9, 77.6) | 71.9% (64.9, 78.1) | 1.15 |