Skip to main content

Table 2 Fit indexes for measurement equivalence tests of RRS-10

From: Psychometric properties of the 10-item ruminative response scale in Chinese university students

Model

χ2

df

IFI

TLI

CFI

RMSEA

GFI

PGFI

model comparison

â–³CFI

△χ2 (△df)

P Value

RMSEA 90% CI

LO90

HI90

Model 1

606.520

60

0.941

0.911

0.941

0.042

0.977

0.533

    

0.039

0.045

Model 2

613.650

70

0.941

0.924

0.941

0.039

0.976

0.621

2 vs 1

0.000

7.129(10)

0.713

0.036

0.041

Model 3

614.338

71

0.941

0.925

0.941

0.038

0.976

0.630

3 vs 2

0.001

0.688(1)

0.407

0.034

0.039

Model 4

635.907

85

0.940

0.937

0.940

0.035

0.976

0.754

4 vs 3

0.003

21.569(14)

0.088

0.031

0.036

  1. Model 1 = configural equivalence; Model 2 = metric equivalence;Model 3 = strong equivalence; Model 4 = strict equivalence