Skip to main content

Table 1 Receiver operating characteristics estimates and optimal ‘caution’ cut-off scores of MAYSI-2 scales (Total Sample)

From: Diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off scores of the Massachusetts youth screening instrument-second version in a sample of Swiss youths in welfare and juvenile justice institutions

Total sample

 

Sens/Spec

PPV/NPV

AUC (95% CI)

Optimal cut-offa

Current cut-offb

Any substance use (K-SADS-PL)

 MAYSI-2 alcohol/drug use

.76/.75

.35/.95

.83*** (.79–.87)

4

4

Any disruptive behavior (K-SADS-PL)

 MAYSI-2 angry-irritable

.59/.55

.54/.60

.61*** (.55–.66)

5

5

Any affective (K-SADS-PL)

 MAYSI-2 depressed-anxious

.52/.63

.21/.88

.62*** (.56–.69)

4

3

 MAYSI-2 somatic complaints

.58/.48

.17/.86

.53 ns (.46–.60)

(2)

3

Any anxiety (K-SADS-PL)

 MAYSI-2 depressed-anxious

.63/.64

.17/.93

.67*** (.59–.74)

4

3

 MAYSI-2 somatic complaints

.58/.68

.18/.93

.67*** (.60–.74)

3

3

Suicide ideation/suicide attempts (K-SADS-PL)

 MAYSI-2 suicide ideation

.74/.67

.39/.90

.75*** (.70–.81)

2

2

  1. MAYSI-2 Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-second version, K-SADS-PL Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children Present and Lifetime version, Sens sensitivity rate, Spec specificity rate, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, AUC area under the curve, CI confidence interval
  2. *** p < .001; ns not significant
  3. aThe optimal ‘caution’ cut-off scores are based on the difference between the sensitivity and specificity value to find the cut-off score with the lowest difference between both values
  4. bThe current cut-off scores are based on the results of the USA National Norms Study for the MAYSI-2 [17]