Skip to main content

Table 5 Correlations between the dynamic risk/protective factors and recidivism, separately for female adolescent sexual and nonsexual offenders

From: Female adolescent sexual and nonsexual violent offenders: a comparison of the prevalence and impact of risk and protective factors for general recidivism

 

Dynamic risk factors

 

Dynamic protective factors

 

FSOs

FNSOs

Z

FSOs

FNSOs

Z

(n = 31)

(n = 407)

 

(n = 31)

(n = 407)

 

School

.25

.01

1.26

-.26

-.19a

.38

Relationships

.30

.16a

.76

-.29

-.13a

.86

Family

.48a

.12a

2.06b

-.46a

-.17a

1.66

Alcohol/drugs

.09

.04

.26

-.16

-.08

.42

Attitude

.30

.26a

.22

-.36b

-.27a

.51

Aggression

.53a

.20a

1.98b

-.39b

-.23a

.91

Skills

.29

.20a

.49

-.30

-.18a

.65

  1. *Significant after controlling for the false discovery rate using the method of Benjamini and Hochberg (1995), using a .05 level for the false discovery rate
  2. +Trend-significant after controlling for the false discovery rate using the method of Benjamini and Hochberg (1995), using a .10 level for the false discovery rate
  3. z = Fisher’s z significance test for the difference between groups in the strength of the correlations between the risk factors and recidivism