Skip to main content

Table 11 Probabilistic results from the Thyme et al. [14] scenario: verbal therapy versus art therapy

From: The clinical and cost effectiveness of group art therapy for people with non-psychotic mental health disorders: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis

  

Using the Ara and Brazier (2008) mapping [25]

Using the Rowen et al. (2009) mapping [26]

Duration of residual benefit

Costing Source

Inc costs (£)

Inc QALY

Cost per QALY (£) (95 % CI)

Inc costs (£)

Inc QALY

Cost per QALY (£) (95 % CI)

52 weeks

BAAT

−16

0.0675

Dominating (Dominating–183a)

−16

0.0757

Dominating (Dominating–99a)

52 weeks

Curtis [28]

−22

0.0675

Dominating (Dominating–251a)

−22

0.0757

Dominating (Dominating–136a)

104 weeks

BAAT

−16

0.1241

Dominating (Dominating–168a)

−16

0.1391

Dominating (Dominating–91a)

104 weeks

Curtis [28]

−22

0.1241

Dominating (Dominating–230a)

−22

0.1391

Dominating (Dominating–125a)

  1. N.B.: Dominated means both more expensive and less efficacious
  2. Inc Incremental
  3. aThese values represent cost per QALY lost and as such these upper bound values indicate art therapy is more cost effective than verbal therapy