Skip to main content

Table 3 Description of included studies

From: Systematic review of feasibility and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for schizophrenia in low and middle income countries

Country (Author, date)

Study design

Intervention

Intervention workforce

Sample

Measures of acceptability and feasibility identified

1. China (Xiong et al., 1994 [40])

Randomised controlled trial (RCT)

1. Monthly 45 minute counselling sessions with patient and family

Therapist

63 families

Compliance

34 in intervention group

2. Family group therapy sessions

29 in control group

2. China (Ran et al., 2003 [27])

RCT

1. Monthly family visit incorporating psychoeducation

Therapist

326 patients and families

Reasons for refusal to participate

2. Family workshops

126 cases in family intervention group

3. Crisis intervention

103 cases in pharmacological treatment group

97 cases in control group

3. Poland (Slupczynska-Kossobudzka et al., 1999 [36])

Cohort

1. Medication management

Multidisciplinary team: psychiatrist, psychologist, 3 nurses, social worker

88 patients and families

Satisfaction scale

2. Individual psychotherapy

3. Daily living and social skills training

4. Therapeutic work with family

5. Welfare assistance

4. Turkey (Tas et al., 2012 [35])

Randomised pilot study

1. Family-assisted social cognition and interaction training (14 session group training)

Family members trained as “cognition partners”

45 patients and 45 family members

Satisfaction scale

5. China (Zhang et al., 1993 [49])

Cohort

1. Family psychoeducation (10 lectures, 3 discussion groups)

Psychologist

3092 patients

Participation rates

6. China (Zhang et al., 1994 [25])

Cohort

1. Family counselling

Counsellors

83 patients and family

Description of feasibility issues

2. Home visits for non-attenders

7. Egypt, (Gohar et al., 2013 [33])

RCT

1. Social cognition training (2 sessions per week for 8 weeks)

Psychiatrist

42 patients 22 in intervention group

Satisfaction scale

20 in control group (skills training intervention)

8. Poland (Chadzynska et al., 2011 [37])

Cross-sectional

1. Group psychoeducation sessions

Therapist

167 patients

Questionnaire covering opinions on sessions

9. Chile (Caqueo-Urízar et al., 2009 [39])

Cross-sectional

1. Multifamily intervention programme for caregivers – 18 weekly sessions (psychoeducation and living skills)

Not reported

41 primary caregivers

Satisfaction questionnaire

10. India (Kulhara et al., 2009 [32])

RCT

1. Manualised psychoeducation intervention for carers (monthly sessions of 1 hr)

Mental health professionals

38 patients and caregivers in both experimental and control groups

Satisfaction questionnaire

11. Brazil (Cabral et al., 2010 [29])

Cross-sectional

1. Weekly psychoeducational and supportive therapy group for patients

Not reported

44 primary caregivers

Opinion questionnaire and satisfaction scale

2. Weekly psychoeducational multi-family group

12. Thailand, (Worakul et al., 2007 [34])

Cohort

1. Family psychoeducational programme (1 day programme didactic component and group discussion)

Psychiatrists

91 primary caregivers

Satisfaction scale

13. Czech Republic (Motlova et al., 2006 [38])

Prospective follow up study

1. Outpatient clinic based psychoeducation intervention for patients and family

Professionals (not specified)

53 patients, 93 family members

Outcome questionnaire

14. India (Balaji et al., 2012 [23])

Qualitative

Collaborative community-based care:

Community lay health workers

In-depth interviews with 32 patients, 38 caregivers

Qualitative

1. Psychoeducation

2. Adherence management

3. Rehabilitation

4. Referral to community agents

15. Brazil (Zimmer et al., 2006 [24])

Qualitative

1. CBT incorporating cognitive differentiation, social perception, verbal communication, social skills, interpersonal problem solving

Not reported

22 patients’ expressions of perceptions of intervention (written and verbal accounts)

Qualitative

16. South Africa (Pooe et al., 2010 [43])

Qualitative

1. Patient psychoeducation

Not reported

Focus groups with 9 in-patients

Qualitative

9 out-patients (study did not disaggregate in analysis)

Semi–structured interviews with 15 patients

17. South Africa (Asmal et al., 2013 [41])

Qualitative

1. Family therapy – multi family groups of schizophrenia patients and caregivers

Psychiatric nurse

Semi-structured interviews, 20 patients and 20 family members

Qualitative