Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Sustained improvements in students’ mental health literacy with use of a mental health curriculum in Canadian schools

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Sep 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
28 May 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stanley Kutcher
Resubmission - Version 2
28 May 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stanley Kutcher
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Weist
7 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alan Leschied
9 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Deborah Begoray
12 Nov 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stanley Kutcher
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Nov 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 Nov 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stanley Kutcher
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Nov 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
15 Dec 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stanley Kutcher
Resubmission - Version 7
15 Dec 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
20 Dec 2014 Editorially accepted
31 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/s12888-014-0379-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement