Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Validity of subjective versus objective quality of life assessment in people with schizophrenia

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Aug 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Karen Petra Hayhurst
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yong Sik Kim
31 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Kurtz
2 Dec 2014 Author responded Author comments - Karen Petra Hayhurst
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Dec 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Dec 2014 Author responded Author comments - Karen Petra Hayhurst
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Dec 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
17 Dec 2014 Editorially accepted
24 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/s12888-014-0365-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement