Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Long-acting olanzapine versus long-acting risperidone for schizophrenia in Spain – a cost-effectiveness comparison

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Mar 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Jorgen Moller
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yen Kuang Yang
22 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sang-Hyuk Lee
27 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jorgen Moller
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
12 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yen Kuang Yang
20 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gianluca Baio
23 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Jorgen Moller
Resubmission - Version 6
23 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
15 Oct 2014 Editorially accepted
2 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/s12888-014-0298-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement