Skip to main content

Table 4 Relationships between socio-demographic characteristics and reported professional and non-professional contacts for MH problems-ARMHS 3-year follow-up (N = 1231)

From: Self-reported contacts for mental health problems by rural residents: predicted service needs, facilitators and barriers

Socio-demographic characteristic¥

Sub-group N

Professional service utilisation

Non-professional service utilisation

  

N (%)

AOR (99% CI)

N (%)

AOR (99% CI)

Age (years):

     

18-34

52

10 (19)

 

10 (19)

 

35-44

124

31 (25)

1.74 (0.58, 5.19)

30 (24)

1.54 (0.51, 4.62)

45-54

266

60 (23)

1.51 (0.54, 4.24)

59 (22)

1.34 (0.48, 3.76)

55-64

379

63 (17)

1.10 (0.39, 3.11)

55 (15)

0.86 (0.30, 2.45)

65+

410

52 (13)

0.75 (0.26, 2.20)

40 (9.8)

0.57 (0.19, 1.71)

Gender:

     

Male

478

63 (13)

 

48 (10)

 

Female

753

153 (20)

1.64 (1.06, 2.55)*

146 (19)

2.14 (1.32, 3.45)**

Education:

     

Partial schooling

303

40 (13)

 

32 (11)

 

Completed high school or above

857

160 (19)

1.63 (0.95, 2.77)

152 (18)

1.86 (1.04, 3.33)*

Unknown

71

16 (23)

2.04 (0.85, 4.93)

10 (14)

1.50 (0.53, 4.23)

Marital status:

     

Married/de facto

950

145 (15)

 

130 (14)

 

Divorced/separated

121

31 (26)

1.67 (0.91, 3.08)

35 (29)

2.41 (1.31, 4.43)**

Widowed

90

19 (21)

1.91 (0.87, 4.19)

13 (14)

1.50 (0.62, 3.68)

Never married

70

21 (30)

2.09 (0.97, 4.49)

16 (23)

1.62 (0.71, 3.73)

ASGC category (Remoteness):

     

Inner regional

544

98 (18)

 

89 (16)

 

Outer regional

419

70 (17)

0.91 (0.57, 1.43)

63 (15)

0.92 (0.57, 1.49)

Remote

179

29 (16)

0.77 (0.41, 1.43)

23 (13)

0.67 (0.34, 1.33)

Very remote

89

19 (21)

1.13 (0.54, 2.40)

19 (21)

1.36 (0.63, 2.93)

Financial position:

     

Prosperous/comfortable

198

26 (13)

 

28 (14)

 

Reasonable

671

104 (16)

1.30 (0.70, 2.42)

91 (14)

0.99 (0.54, 1.84)

Just getting along to very poor

362

86 (24)

2.17 (1.12, 4.18)*

75 (21)

1.67 (0.86, 3.23)

  1. Note: Based on a series of hierarchical logistic regressions, in which socio-demographic characteristics were entered simultaneously at step 1, followed by potential facilitators/barriers at step 2 (see Table 5): *p < 0.01; **p < 0.001. ARMHS: Australian Rural Mental Health Study; AOR: Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval. ¥ Comparable categories to Table 3 of Perkins et al. (2013) [24], but based on 3-year follow-up data.