Skip to main content

Table 6 Self-reports and sociodemographic variables for disorganized schizotypy, negative schizotypy and control groups (Replication study)

From: Relationship between anticipatory, consummatory anhedonia and disorganization in schizotypy

 

Disorganized group

Negative schizotypy

Control group

 

N = 22

N = 19

N = 236

p

ES

Gendera

4 (18)

3 (16)

16 (7)

.09

 

Ageb

20.23 (2.39)

28.05 (11.09)

24.11 (6.75)

.002*

 

RPAS-ANTb

1.95 (1.46)

2.58 (1.54)

1.32 (1.26)

0001*

.079

RPAS-CONSb

5.45 (2.79)

5.63 (2.54)

5.74 (2.46)

.0003*

.067

SASb

11.36 (3.44)

6.89 (2.85)

3.87 (3.03)

.0001*

.038

  1. (aNumber (and percent) male, bmean (and standard deviation) *p < .01: Bonferroni correction; Analysis of variance for age and Analysis of covariance for the three scales scores with age as covariate anticipatory (RPAS-ANT) and consummatory (RPAS-CONS) subscales of the Revised Physical Anhedonia Scale (RPAS); Schizotypal ambivalence scale (SAS)). Post hoc tests: RPAS-ANT: Negative schizotypy group > Control group (p = .0002); SAS: Disorganized schizotypy group > Control group (p = .00012). Disorganized schizotypy group > Negative schizotypy group (p = .00014): Negative schizotypy group > Control group (p = .00001). ES: effect size using eta square.