Skip to main content

Table 3 Secondary care screening model: Advantages and disadvantages

From: Prevention of coronary heart disease in people with severe mental illnesses: a qualitative study of patient and professionals' preferences for care

 

View expressed by *

Perceived advantages of delivering screening in secondary care

CMHT

GP

SU

N

• CMHT staff have a better rapport and understanding of people with SMI

12

• CMHT has better access to and knowledge of people with SMI

 

8

• The CMHT setting and workers are less threatening for patients than the GP environment and easier to trust – this might reduce the non-attendance rates

 

6

• CMHT staff can access patients in a greater variety of settings, thus enhancing the uptake of screening

  

6

• It promotes a more holistic model of care – 'not just a prescription'

  

4

• It is better to unite clients' physical and mental health care in one place

 

3

• CMHT staff are more experienced than GPs in working assertively with people with SMI

 

3

• If the CHD risk factors are linked to having SMI, then the CMHT should take responsibility for screening

 

3

• Psychiatrists prescribe the antipsychotics which require risk factor screening

 

2

• CMHT workers have more time and can offer longer appointments

  

2

• It would allow CMHT staff to develop new skills

  

1

• There are shorter waiting times at CMHT compared to the GP

  

1

Perceived disadvantages

    

• The CMHT workload is already high – they lack the time for extra responsibilities

19

• Lack of skills and knowledge required for screening amongst care coordinators, especially those without nursing or medical training

 

12

• Lack of appropriate facilities – e.g. equipment, clinical rooms, access to blood results in community settings

 

9

• Unwillingness of CMHT staff to take on extra roles

 

8

• Lack of medical expertise in the CMHT regarding appropriate interventions if screening results are positive – care will either be inferior or simply result in re-referral to primary care.

 

5

• It blurs the role of the CMHT

  

5

• Some service users mistrust psychiatric services and don't want their involvement

 

4

• CMHTs only see the most severely mentally ill people, so some patients will be overlooked

  

3

• It would be stigmatising (not normalising) to have separate services for people with SMI

  

3

• Patients like to keep their mental health and physical health separate

 

3

• Mental health meetings such as Care Programme Approach meetings are inappropriate settings for screening

  

2

• It would cause stress for CMHT staff who might feel to blame if CHD morbidity was undetected

  

2

• Lack of continuity with CMHT staff – they tend to come and go more often than GP staff

 

2

• CMHT bases are less accessible than GPs geographically

  

1

  1. * Note: Tick-boxes indicate which group(s) of participants expressed the view: CMHT = staff from community mental health team; GP = staff from general practice; SU = service users. Numbers (N) indicate the prevalence of each view within the total sample.