Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 May 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alberto Parabiaghi |
10 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Kemp |
10 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Danielle Coppola |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
9 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Kemp |
14 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alberto Parabiaghi |
22 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Danielle Coppola |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
22 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
9 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alberto Parabiaghi |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Publishing | ||
28 Mar 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Mar 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-12-26 |
You can find further information about peer review here.