Parameter estimates | SEM coefficient | Standard Error | p-value |
---|---|---|---|
Husband’s PCMDs |  |  |  |
  Intimate partner violence | 0.57 | 0.24 | 0.01 |
  Wife’s PCMD | 0.51 | 0.34 | 0.13 |
  Province: Ha Nam | -0.5 | 0.53 | 0.34 |
  (Wife) Affectionate and trusting relationship with own mother: No | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.49 |
  (Wife) Coincidental life adversity: Yes | 0.62 | 0.23 | 0.001 |
  (Wife) Fear of other family members: Yes | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.13 |
Intimate partner violence | Â | Â | Â |
  Wife PCMD | -0.19 | 0.50 | 0.69 |
  (Wife) age (in years) | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.62 |
  (Wife) education: Year 9 and less | 0.09 | 0.51 | 0.85 |
  (Wife) permanent income: Yes | -0.04 | 0.50 | 0.92 |
  (Husband) Affectionate relationship with mother-in-law: No | 0.97 | 0.46 | 0.03 |
  First child: Yes | -0.14 | 0.71 | 0.83 |
  Household wealth index: Low | -0.12 | 0.17 | 0.49 |
Intimate partner violence defined by | Â | Â | Â |
  Husband’s perception of control from his wife (Husband’s IBM Control score) | 1.00 |  |  |
  Care from wife to husband (Husband’s IBM Care score) | -0.63 | 0.33 | 0.06 |
  Fear of or experience of physical abuse from his wife | 0.59 | 0.24 | 0.01 |
Effect from wife PCMDs to probability of husband’s PCMDs |  |  |  |
  Indirect effect via intimate partner violence | 0.39 | 0.27 | 0.14 |
  Direct effect | -0.11 | 0.29 | 0.69 |
Thresholds | Estimate | Â | Â |
  Husband’s PCMD | 1.54 |  |  |
  Intimate partner violence | 0.55 |  |  |
Fit indices | Estimates | Â | Â |
  χ2/df (p-value) | 47.1/70 (p=0.93) |  |  |
  RMSEA (Probability RMSEA <= .05) | <0.003 (p=0.98) |  |  |
  CFI | 0.99 |  |  |
  TLI | 0.99 |  |  |