Skip to main content

Table 2 Visual field difference of number of omissions and Alertness performance (mean ± SD)

From: Alertness and visuospatial attention in clinical depression

 

Depression

(n = 16)

Control

(n = 16)

T

(df = 15)

p

regression:

total R2

p

β1: WAF alertness

β2: BDI sad mood

T

(df = 13)

p

TAP Neglect

Omissions

(LVF-RVF)

0.19 ± 0.75

-0.21 ± 0.89

1.24

.234

.458

.019

β1: .67

β2: -.12

3.27

-0.59

.006*

.564

TAP Visual Scanning

Omissions

(LVF-RVF)

-0.25 ± 2.27

-0.71 ± 2.59

0.48

.638

.047

.731

β1: -.19

β2: .10

-0.71

0.38

.491

.707

WAF Extinction-Neglect

Omissions

(LVF-RVF)

0.50 ± 1.10

0.06 ± 0.93

1.39

.186

.369

.050

β1: .40

β2: .45

1.80

2.06

.095

.060

WAF Alertness

(RT in ms)

278.8 ± 100.3

261.0 ± 29.2

0.68

.510

-

-

-

-

-

  1. LVF: left visual field, RVF: right visual field, RT: reaction time, *significant according to Bonferroni-corrected threshold; T-values and p-values of the group comparisons are displayed together with parameters of a linear regression model including the predictors WAF Alertness and sad mood item of BDI.