From: Dual diagnosis clients' treatment satisfaction - a systematic review
Author | Sample | Treatment intervention | Control condition | Satisfaction levels between groups | Treatment fidelity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aguilera et al. (1999) [38] | N = 86 Main DD: mood disorder + polydrug misuse | DD treatment (n = 40) | Drug/alcohol treatment (n = 46) | No difference in treatment satisfaction scores. Results of statistical tests not reported. | Not reported |
Anderson (1999) [37] | N = 225 Main DD: psychosis + polydrug misuse | DD treatment (n = 76) | Drug/alcohol treatment (n = 149) | Higher satisfaction levels among intervention group (n = 42) but relevant tests not reported. | Not reported |
Clark et al. (2008) [41] | N = 2,729 Main DD: unspecified + history of trauma | Trauma-focused DD treatment (n = 1,415) | Mental health or drug/alcohol treatment (n = 1,314) | Intervention group had higher satisfaction scores at follow-ups (3-month: F = 8.77, p < 0.01; 6-month: F = 4.07, p < 0.05). | Not reported |
Craig et al. (2008) [52] | N = 232 Main DD: psychosis + alcohol misuse | DD treatment (n = 127) | Mental health treatment (n = 105) | No significant differences in satisfaction levels (CSQ: p = 0.39, TPQ: p = 0.62). | Not reported |
Daughters et al. (2008) [44] | N = 44 Main DD: mood and anxiety disorders + cocaine misuse | Depression-focused DD treatment (n = 22) | Drug/alcohol treatment (n = 22) | The intervention group reported significantly higher satisfaction levels (p < 0.01). | High levels of treatment fidelity (mean = 7.3 on 9-point Likert scale). |
Morse et al. (2006) [30] | N = 149 Main DD: schizophrenia + alcohol misuse | Assertive DD treatment (IACT; n = 46) | 1. Assertive mental health treatment (ACTO; n = 54) 2. Standard mental health or drug / alcohol treatment (SC; n = 49) | Clients in the IACT and ACTO programme were significantly more satisfied than SC clients (p = 0.03). 1, 2 | Treatment diffusion between IACT and ACTO. 3 |
N = 270 Main DD: schizophrenia + alcohol misuse | New assertive DD treatment (NIACT; n = 79) | 1. IACT (n = 61) 2. ACTO (n = 65) 3. SC (n = 65) | Clients in the NIACT programme were significantly more satisfied than clients in the other 3 programmes (p < 0.001). | High level of treatment fidelity in the NIACT model. 4 |