Skip to main content

Table 2 Aetiology of measured environments - univariate ACE models

From: Environmental exposures and their genetic or environmental contribution to depression and fatigue: a twin study in Sri Lanka

Measured environment

Sex group

Variance Components

  

Fit

  

A

C

E

Δ χ2

Δ df

P

Early school leaving

Male

0.53 (0.15-0.74)

0.36 (0.18-0.71)

0.10 (0.06-0.18)

1.9071

1

0.167

 

Female

0.35 (0.13-0.65)

0.57 (0.28-0.77)

0.08 (0.04-0.13)

   
 

Combined

0.45 (0.31-0.60)

0.46 (0.32-0.59)

0.09 (0.06-0.13)

1.766 2

2

0.413

Standard of living

Male

0.16 (0.00-0.44)

0.60 (0.36-0.79)

0.23 (0.15-0.32)

0.3981

1

0.528

 

Female

0.22 (0.00-0.47)

0.55 (0.34-0.77)

0.22 (0.15-0.32)

   
 

Combined

0.20 (0.00-0.40)

0.57 (0.41-0.73)

0.23 (0.17-0.30)

0.095 2

2

0.953

Life events

Male

0.34 (0.00-0.59)

0.13 (0.00-0.45)

0.53 (0.41-0.66)

0.4411

1

0.507

 

Female

0.45 (0.14-0.57)

0.02 (0.00-0.27)

0.53 (0.42-0.65)

   
 

Combined

0.44 (0.20-0.55)

0.03 (0.00-0.22)

0.53 (0.45-0.62)

0.457 2

2

0.796

Parental care (continuous)

Male

0.36 (0.15-0.59)

0.28 (0.07-0.47)

0.36 (0.31-0.42)

14.0203

4.6414

8

1

0.081

0.031

 

Female

0.12 (0.003-0.30)

0.45 (0.29-0.57)

0.43 (0.37-0.48)

   
 

Combined

0.22 (0.09-0.36)

0.39 (0.25-0.50)

0.40 (0.36-0.44)

3.829 2

2 2

0.147

  1. Best fitting model shown in bold
  2. 1Fit of ACE model to fully saturated model
  3. 2Fit of model dropping quantitative sex differences compared to models with A, C and E parameters estimated separately for males and females.
  4. 3Fit of scalar ACE model to fully saturated model
  5. 4Fit of model dropping qualitative sex differences