Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
15 Dec 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francisco Diaz |
15 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph DiFranza |
2 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brett Hagman |
5 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Joy Johnson |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
15 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Joy Johnson |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Jun 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Francisco Diaz |
2 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brett Hagman |
17 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Joy Johnson |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
17 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
28 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brett Hagman |
1 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Joy Johnson |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
1 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
29 Nov 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Joy Johnson |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
29 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
30 Nov 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
30 Nov 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-244X-10-101 |
You can find further information about peer review here.